linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later
@ 2018-11-29  1:52 Jaegeuk Kim
  2018-11-30  1:50 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
  2018-12-05 19:29 ` Pavel Machek
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2018-11-29  1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim

This adds an option in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN) in order to trigger fsck by
setting a NEED_FSCK flag.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
 fs/f2fs/file.c | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index aa500239baf2..7cec897146a3 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static inline bool __has_cursum_space(struct f2fs_journal *journal,
 #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METASYNC	0x1	/* going down with metadata */
 #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NOSYNC		0x2	/* going down */
 #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METAFLUSH	0x3	/* going down with meta flush */
+#define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK	0x4	/* going down to trigger fsck */
 
 #if defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT)
 /*
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index ff82350a2c55..ca9bdbb8651b 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -1966,6 +1966,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_shutdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
 		f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
 		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN);
 		break;
+	case F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK:
+		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
+		/* do checkpoint only */
+		ret = f2fs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
+		break;
 	default:
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
-- 
2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later
  2018-11-29  1:52 [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2018-11-30  1:50 ` Chao Yu
  2018-11-30 20:36   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2018-12-05 19:29 ` Pavel Machek
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2018-11-30  1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

On 2018/11/29 9:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This adds an option in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN) in order to trigger fsck by
> setting a NEED_FSCK flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index aa500239baf2..7cec897146a3 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static inline bool __has_cursum_space(struct f2fs_journal *journal,
>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METASYNC	0x1	/* going down with metadata */
>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NOSYNC		0x2	/* going down */
>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METAFLUSH	0x3	/* going down with meta flush */
> +#define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK	0x4	/* going down to trigger fsck */

Why not add a new ioctl interface for this? F2FS_GOING_DOWN_ prefix implies
filesystem will shutdown, IMO, we'd better to keep all sub-interfaces being
consistent in f2fs_ioc_shutdown().

>  
>  #if defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT)
>  /*
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index ff82350a2c55..ca9bdbb8651b 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -1966,6 +1966,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_shutdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
>  		f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
>  		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN);
>  		break;
> +	case F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK:
> +		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> +		/* do checkpoint only */
> +		ret = f2fs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out;

In large-sized image, it may take long time to trigger full scan during
boot, so I'd like to ask how often we set this flag?

Thanks,

> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto out;
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later
  2018-11-30  1:50 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
@ 2018-11-30 20:36   ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2018-12-07  9:53     ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2018-11-30 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

On 11/30, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/11/29 9:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This adds an option in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN) in order to trigger fsck by
> > setting a NEED_FSCK flag.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> >  fs/f2fs/file.c | 7 +++++++
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index aa500239baf2..7cec897146a3 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static inline bool __has_cursum_space(struct f2fs_journal *journal,
> >  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METASYNC	0x1	/* going down with metadata */
> >  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NOSYNC		0x2	/* going down */
> >  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METAFLUSH	0x3	/* going down with meta flush */
> > +#define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK	0x4	/* going down to trigger fsck */
> 
> Why not add a new ioctl interface for this? F2FS_GOING_DOWN_ prefix implies
> filesystem will shutdown, IMO, we'd better to keep all sub-interfaces being
> consistent in f2fs_ioc_shutdown().

I'm thinking to use this for QA as device shutdown tests.

> 
> >  
> >  #if defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT)
> >  /*
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > index ff82350a2c55..ca9bdbb8651b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > @@ -1966,6 +1966,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_shutdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
> >  		f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
> >  		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN);
> >  		break;
> > +	case F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK:
> > +		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> > +		/* do checkpoint only */
> > +		ret = f2fs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto out;
> 
> In large-sized image, it may take long time to trigger full scan during
> boot, so I'd like to ask how often we set this flag?

Based on the use of shutdown ioctl, I'll use this for testing purpose, so it
won't be used for regular cases.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > +		break;
> >  	default:
> >  		ret = -EINVAL;
> >  		goto out;
> > 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later
  2018-11-29  1:52 [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later Jaegeuk Kim
  2018-11-30  1:50 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
@ 2018-12-05 19:29 ` Pavel Machek
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2018-12-05 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

On Wed 2018-11-28 17:52:57, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This adds an option in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN) in order to trigger fsck by
> setting a NEED_FSCK flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

I don't expect to use it too often, but it makes sense.
									Pavel
									
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later
  2018-11-30 20:36   ` Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2018-12-07  9:53     ` Chao Yu
  2018-12-13  3:56       ` Jaegeuk Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2018-12-07  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

On 2018/12/1 4:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 11/30, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/11/29 9:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> This adds an option in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN) in order to trigger fsck by
>>> setting a NEED_FSCK flag.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
>>>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 7 +++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index aa500239baf2..7cec897146a3 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static inline bool __has_cursum_space(struct f2fs_journal *journal,
>>>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METASYNC	0x1	/* going down with metadata */
>>>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NOSYNC		0x2	/* going down */
>>>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METAFLUSH	0x3	/* going down with meta flush */
>>> +#define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK	0x4	/* going down to trigger fsck */
>>
>> Why not add a new ioctl interface for this? F2FS_GOING_DOWN_ prefix implies
>> filesystem will shutdown, IMO, we'd better to keep all sub-interfaces being
>> consistent in f2fs_ioc_shutdown().
> 
> I'm thinking to use this for QA as device shutdown tests.
> 
>>
>>>  
>>>  #if defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT)
>>>  /*
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> index ff82350a2c55..ca9bdbb8651b 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> @@ -1966,6 +1966,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_shutdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
>>>  		f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
>>>  		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN);
>>>  		break;
>>> +	case F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK:
>>> +		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>> +		/* do checkpoint only */
>>> +		ret = f2fs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			goto out;
>>
>> In large-sized image, it may take long time to trigger full scan during
>> boot, so I'd like to ask how often we set this flag?
> 
> Based on the use of shutdown ioctl, I'll use this for testing purpose, so it
> won't be used for regular cases.

How about adding some commit messages or comments on
F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK marco definition to give a bit hint for f2fs
developers to know the usage of the interface?

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> +		break;
>>>  	default:
>>>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>>>  		goto out;
>>>
> 
> .
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later
  2018-12-07  9:53     ` Chao Yu
@ 2018-12-13  3:56       ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2018-12-13  6:30         ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2018-12-13  3:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

On 12/07, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/12/1 4:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 11/30, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2018/11/29 9:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> This adds an option in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN) in order to trigger fsck by
> >>> setting a NEED_FSCK flag.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> >>>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 7 +++++++
> >>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>> index aa500239baf2..7cec897146a3 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>> @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static inline bool __has_cursum_space(struct f2fs_journal *journal,
> >>>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METASYNC	0x1	/* going down with metadata */
> >>>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NOSYNC		0x2	/* going down */
> >>>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METAFLUSH	0x3	/* going down with meta flush */
> >>> +#define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK	0x4	/* going down to trigger fsck */
> >>
> >> Why not add a new ioctl interface for this? F2FS_GOING_DOWN_ prefix implies
> >> filesystem will shutdown, IMO, we'd better to keep all sub-interfaces being
> >> consistent in f2fs_ioc_shutdown().
> > 
> > I'm thinking to use this for QA as device shutdown tests.
> > 
> >>
> >>>  
> >>>  #if defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT)
> >>>  /*
> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>> index ff82350a2c55..ca9bdbb8651b 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>> @@ -1966,6 +1966,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_shutdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
> >>>  		f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
> >>>  		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN);
> >>>  		break;
> >>> +	case F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK:
> >>> +		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> >>> +		/* do checkpoint only */
> >>> +		ret = f2fs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
> >>> +		if (ret)
> >>> +			goto out;
> >>
> >> In large-sized image, it may take long time to trigger full scan during
> >> boot, so I'd like to ask how often we set this flag?
> > 
> > Based on the use of shutdown ioctl, I'll use this for testing purpose, so it
> > won't be used for regular cases.
> 
> How about adding some commit messages or comments on
> F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK marco definition to give a bit hint for f2fs
> developers to know the usage of the interface?

Done. :P

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>> +		break;
> >>>  	default:
> >>>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> >>>  		goto out;
> >>>
> > 
> > .
> > 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later
  2018-12-13  3:56       ` Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2018-12-13  6:30         ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2018-12-13  6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

On 2018/12/13 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 12/07, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/12/1 4:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 11/30, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2018/11/29 9:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>> This adds an option in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN) in order to trigger fsck by
>>>>> setting a NEED_FSCK flag.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
>>>>>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 7 +++++++
>>>>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> index aa500239baf2..7cec897146a3 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static inline bool __has_cursum_space(struct f2fs_journal *journal,
>>>>>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METASYNC	0x1	/* going down with metadata */
>>>>>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NOSYNC		0x2	/* going down */
>>>>>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METAFLUSH	0x3	/* going down with meta flush */
>>>>> +#define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK	0x4	/* going down to trigger fsck */
>>>>
>>>> Why not add a new ioctl interface for this? F2FS_GOING_DOWN_ prefix implies
>>>> filesystem will shutdown, IMO, we'd better to keep all sub-interfaces being
>>>> consistent in f2fs_ioc_shutdown().
>>>
>>> I'm thinking to use this for QA as device shutdown tests.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>  #if defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT)
>>>>>  /*
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>>>> index ff82350a2c55..ca9bdbb8651b 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>>>> @@ -1966,6 +1966,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_shutdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
>>>>>  		f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
>>>>>  		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN);
>>>>>  		break;
>>>>> +	case F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK:
>>>>> +		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>>>> +		/* do checkpoint only */
>>>>> +		ret = f2fs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
>>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>>> +			goto out;
>>>>
>>>> In large-sized image, it may take long time to trigger full scan during
>>>> boot, so I'd like to ask how often we set this flag?
>>>
>>> Based on the use of shutdown ioctl, I'll use this for testing purpose, so it
>>> won't be used for regular cases.
>>
>> How about adding some commit messages or comments on
>> F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK marco definition to give a bit hint for f2fs
>> developers to know the usage of the interface?
> 
> Done. :P
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev

Looks good to me now. ;)

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>> +		break;
>>>>>  	default:
>>>>>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>>>>>  		goto out;
>>>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
> 
> .
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-13  6:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-29  1:52 [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later Jaegeuk Kim
2018-11-30  1:50 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2018-11-30 20:36   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-12-07  9:53     ` Chao Yu
2018-12-13  3:56       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-12-13  6:30         ` Chao Yu
2018-12-05 19:29 ` Pavel Machek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).