From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AEAC04EB8 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 21:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88F220660 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 21:50:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E88F220660 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726779AbeLAJAp (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2018 04:00:45 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:48201 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726078AbeLAJAp (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2018 04:00:45 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Nov 2018 13:50:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,300,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="118888371" Received: from jsakkine-mobl1.jf.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.241.225.27]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2018 13:50:03 -0800 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:50:03 -0800 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Nikolay Borisov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , James Hogan , Joshua Kinard , "open list:MIPS" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/15] MIPS: replace **** with a hug Message-ID: <20181130215003.GH23772@linux.intel.com> References: <20181130192737.15053-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181130192737.15053-2-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20181130195758.GA20328@linux.intel.com> <9ba4d08d-10d1-c233-476a-c73051b8c9f5@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ba4d08d-10d1-c233-476a-c73051b8c9f5@suse.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:06:30PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > I find it quite ridiculous that grown up people are engaging at yet > another coc-related conversation and are on the way to blowing it out of > proportions. Let's focus on improving the ACTUAL code what's the point > to bikeshed on the word? > > I've seen people before me comment that some comments are plainly out of > date and that warrants their removal but otherwise nitpicking things > like that. It seems common sense is very scant these days... I have absolutely nothing against CoC. If you look up from LKML, there total zero posts from criticizing of having such. OK, maybe I find it bit too high-level, and yeah, this patch set has been useful to know where the line is. I can go through the commits and think more appropriate alternatives (thus the RFC-tag). Thanks. /Jarkko