Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/offload.c

between commits:

  b5f0cf083400 ("nfp: flower: prevent offload if rhashtable insert fails")

from the net tree and commit:

  7885b4fc8d8e ("nfp: flower: allow non repr netdev offload")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/offload.c
index 2f49eb75f3cc,545d94168874..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/offload.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/offload.c
@@@ -480,14 -469,10 +464,15 @@@ nfp_flower_add_offload(struct nfp_app *
  	err = rhashtable_insert_fast(&priv->flow_table, &flow_pay->fl_node,
  				     nfp_flower_table_params);
  	if (err)
 -		goto err_destroy_flow;
 +		goto err_release_metadata;
 +
- 	err = nfp_flower_xmit_flow(netdev, flow_pay,
++	err = nfp_flower_xmit_flow(app, flow_pay,
 +				   NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_TYPE_FLOW_ADD);
 +	if (err)
 +		goto err_remove_rhash;
  
- 	port->tc_offload_cnt++;
+ 	if (port)
+ 		port->tc_offload_cnt++;
  
  	/* Deallocate flow payload when flower rule has been destroyed. */
  	kfree(key_layer);