From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 08/18] parisc: function_graph: Simplify with function_graph_entry()
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 09:54:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203145404.GF235790@sasha-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181124134634.306192c2@gandalf.local.home>
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 01:46:34PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:00:11 -0500
>Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>> What will happen with these is that once Greg's scripts process Linus's
>> tree he'll end up with this patch series inconsistently backported to
>> stable trees, which is not what you want here.
>
>It's not like it won't work and then start to work again. Once they
>start failing in older versions, they will probably fail in all
>versions before that.
>
>>
>> Sure, we can wait for the "added to the xyz stable tree" mails and
>> object then, but why risk breaking the trees?
>
>Again, it's not much different than other stable patches that need to
>be fixed for older trees. If they build, they are fine, if they don't
>then they need to be fixed. You'll know right at build time.
So the only tree it applied and built was 4.19, all older trees failed
on at least one arch.
I'm going to remove any parts of this series from all other trees.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-22 0:28 [for-next][PATCH 00/18] function_graph: Add separate depth counter to prevent trace corruption Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 01/18] function_graph: Create function_graph_enter() to consolidate architecture code Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 02/18] x86/function_graph: Simplify with function_graph_entry() Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 03/18] ARM: function_graph: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 04/18] arm64: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-27 18:07 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-27 18:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 05/18] microblaze: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 06/18] MIPS: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 07/18] nds32: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 08/18] parisc: " Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <20181123073033.2083020863@mail.kernel.org>
2018-11-23 9:06 ` Helge Deller
2018-11-23 17:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-23 18:34 ` Sasha Levin
2018-11-23 19:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-23 20:00 ` Sasha Levin
2018-11-24 18:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-03 14:54 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 09/18] powerpc/function_graph: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 10/18] riscv/function_graph: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-26 16:47 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 11/18] s390/function_graph: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 6:43 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-11-23 17:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 12/18] sh/function_graph: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 13/18] sparc/function_graph: " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 14/18] function_graph: Make ftrace_push_return_trace() static Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 15/18] function_graph: Use new curr_ret_depth to manage depth instead of curr_ret_stack Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-23 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 16/18] function_graph: Move return callback before update " Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 17/18] function_graph: Reverse the order of pushing the ret_stack and the callback Steven Rostedt
2018-11-22 0:28 ` [for-next][PATCH 18/18] function_graph: Have profiler use curr_ret_stack and not depth Steven Rostedt
2018-11-26 5:15 ` [for-next][PATCH 00/18] function_graph: Add separate depth counter to prevent trace corruption Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-28 20:39 ` Joe Lawrence
2018-11-28 21:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 3:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 4:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 15:08 ` Joe Lawrence
2018-11-29 16:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-29 16:32 ` Joe Lawrence
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181203145404.GF235790@sasha-vm \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).