From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA34C04EB8 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0882082B for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:50:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CF0882082B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725898AbeLDJut (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 04:50:49 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:36286 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725769AbeLDJut (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 04:50:49 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id u3so15175868wrs.3 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 01:50:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZKVbcR4IStGL63pS+Wn8KIAgvCjxvVnFnBrE1QELbR0=; b=qnLABF8cLs0esR9FcgxkhDx/xtQr+Er6tmm9s6KRhSVUOfcFsegrB40NTxM9Uo+G4c DO2Gpu6a+UC9yud56Wmj53+D96CCgs1M1u0iRHEJYFitLX6UyevKi7DQ5Qz4L2DgOUEN k1+YH/ITjg1ztQBmpCLvW8yWd7LORBuHgwkC7A9Z9i7PvG5tKMKOQjv6FP3A52rijpgM JS2aNlgPXgII6smoqWeogm9BZytyNGh/L8zvq7Pzk3Y3u+rcE6Ta0Rihb/6WFNkTSN7Z LD61U1GxP86S3YbQ3xgja3gVd3Fw6m+mYNIGjJ4R+GuTafOxlCwBslsnjS1QH5QDgPqS oBng== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYZwHRxOp/ZSJCybzx0eZ0QrhBSlmmQn/mHsC9ZuRv91jxD9pWF JUJyz2en3dKXmyRsWGbYMXbYzg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XBNLYa2pvbHEB2Jl2yc78WIOzB7EbaXim1lqSLlGmhd5G5sYpAVmrr/9Ip/zXOzRo0izD5RQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fe43:: with SMTP id m3mr16819820wrs.290.1543917047226; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 01:50:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (conf.hotelmediterraneo.com. [2.228.78.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l202sm4698646wma.33.2018.12.04.01.50.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Dec 2018 01:50:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:50:43 +0100 From: Juri Lelli To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Will Deacon , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Atish Patra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou , Anup Patel , Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Dmitriy Cherkasov , Ingo Molnar , Jeremy Linton , "moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)" , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Morten Rasmussen , Palmer Dabbelt , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v1 3/4] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code. Message-ID: <20181204095043.GD23553@localhost.localdomain> References: <1543534100-3654-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> <1543534100-3654-4-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20181203165833.GA27796@arm.com> <20181203171223.GD17883@e107155-lin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181203171223.GD17883@e107155-lin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 03/12/18 17:12, Sudeep Holla wrote: > (Fixed Juri Lelli's email) > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:58:34PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:28:19PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote: > > > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe > > > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to > > > a common place instead of duplicate code. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 22 --- > > > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 303 +------------------------------------- > > > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 294 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Whilst I'm happy seeing this code moved out, I'd like to have an entry in > > MAINTAINERS so that somebody can review changes from the arm64 side without > > having to poll a load of different lists. I assume patches would still go > > via Rafael and Greg, but if we could have Sudeep added as Reviewer for this > > file, then I'd really appreciate it. > > > > Thanks Will for pointing this. I agree with you and like to be added as > reviewer for this. > > Since arch_topology.c was mostly added for ARM/ARM64 and by Juri Lelli > (who is no longer with ARM) and I did review the initial version, I would > like to assume maintenance for this file if both Juri and Greg are OK > with it so that I can keep an eye on this as we expect more changes to > this both for ARM and RISC-V. Sure, this is OK with me. Thanks for keeping an eye on this. Best, - Juri