From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE804C04EB8 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8B520878 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:11:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544098316; bh=kRg434GESQd2lDp4Eh0KrX1YXHlUjdoRutCXfSAi7js=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=vxWch9xek+ltgBqwrb2jZUgRa5PdqkITFdGR5u6C99uyT4oF2haXJzYKBRkDqAikG 06FJEiX5Z/lZ9GuU07/uocJNYWSgZ6yuWlxQ+EtkZ+8OTBNXnqp08JHHSZtq+yI6+2 9h2hTGrLnEoOheBBkRD0whtfuWrUOSqQGLLdqz0Y= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8B8B520878 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729256AbeLFMLz (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 07:11:55 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60914 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727763AbeLFMLz (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 07:11:55 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A99AF63; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 13:11:52 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Pingfan Liu Cc: Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Mike Rapoport , Bjorn Helgaas , Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/alloc: fallback to first node if the wanted node offline Message-ID: <20181206121152.GH1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20181204085601.GC1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181205092148.GA1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> <186b1804-3b1e-340e-f73b-f3c7e69649f5@suse.cz> <20181206082806.GB1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 06-12-18 18:44:03, Pingfan Liu wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:03 PM Pingfan Liu wrote: [...] > > Which commit is this patch applied on? I can not apply it on latest linux tree. > > > I applied it by manual, will see the test result. I think it should > work since you instance all the node. > But there are two things worth to consider: > -1st. why x86 do not bring up all nodes by default, apparently it will > be more simple by that way What do you mean? Why it didn't bring up before? Or do you see some nodes not being brought up after this patch? > -2nd. there are other archs, do they obey the rules? I am afraid that each arch does its own initialization. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs