From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3916BC04EB8 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 00:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E189320868 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 00:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="A9Z0AmxQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E189320868 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725988AbeLGAPy (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:15:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:45586 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725939AbeLGAPy (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:15:54 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id y4so864214pgc.12 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 16:15:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=LrQCzepF32eSc4nulqWoLfzxYmel15K3WRQ7t0gxsl8=; b=A9Z0AmxQgbQ6/n5gJijTU3OosRY1SSL6itGySkugpgf2i7uanLsmLGF3rXlnGrRcF0 MhqpTQ5GiFRHEFAnx02FqitZWiz3uIha+cDZMMt8mI1C3YXHmpamyTw6dI9ZYiLlCeQK ubsMcAoCGK4VayCzEVC18N4zu7ObTMfgBlmYI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=LrQCzepF32eSc4nulqWoLfzxYmel15K3WRQ7t0gxsl8=; b=ISryv0YWE/AJmDMBo89QYEBMHu+KX7PknASNxqr00hqy/m9Io1I8Y03FcrPRT1mcfq qger71T3QKHwxqlLF3EdOdS9bkRHkfonJeO0Jm3gJdGDCeJIXf1XMO6akUpnkOG9Aamg ilFtRcG6j/h1NJUGfzcjU1O/JRRUm73Ms+SE02mw9eTlbbEd/zOj0oLn0xZBCZv9pMRL FPm/BDABtIVDRk1T5Hs9UKhhcCYqO/zkkcBv1s+fvpsMMjuXuWBrdwIc2wdGj0M+OfFB 6yaXsWuUSz4iYNUpmzQ6EhsdudpGbhwfcdB0IWQB5HtTlycVVzl6flHBPwOUZC1dkD6f HEQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaeZJoaOSgDkuxaMJgl2WMqZT0cLCJvLVSoW2FFSaIkQNxJyKzA t1FXzdmbMa9t4AJ9FPChDWiCVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VmNggKG9AdPps+47dVG6ibac4BfZY03f/XpJJt5IQ7hdII7LeIohGHg5q1/1wGkqpB3+PmIA== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6491:: with SMTP id e17mr52023pgv.418.1544141753790; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 16:15:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:202:1:534:b7c0:a63c:460c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm2204682pfd.104.2018.12.06.16.15.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 16:15:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 16:15:42 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Kalle Valo Cc: Joe Perches , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amitkumar Karwar , Nishant Sarmukadam , Ganapathi Bhat , Xinming Hu , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mwifiex: debugfs: correct histogram spacing, formatting Message-ID: <20181207001540.GA165647@google.com> References: <20181130225303.143409-1-briannorris@chromium.org> <20181203222654.GA155572@google.com> <87k1kper11.fsf@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k1kper11.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:37:30AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Brian Norris writes: > > > Here's a v2 that combines both sets of strings in that way. I'm not > > resending the other patches, since they were only related in concept > > (since I was referring to debugfs for implementing the nl80211 stuff), > > but have no real dependency. > > > > @Kalle: I can resend the others as a new series if that helps. > > Yeah, it does. Trying to pick patches from different places in patchwork > is just too much of a hassle for me. So please do resend the whole > series. I've split them up and resent the other 2 unmodified now (as 'RFC PATCH v2 X/2'), as this patch is trivial and not related to the others directly. They can be applied in any order. Hopefully that's sufficient. Brian