From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACBBC65BAF for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 15:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6172082D for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 15:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="qz0Pa6xu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7E6172082D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726191AbeLHPyv (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2018 10:54:51 -0500 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:35532 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726160AbeLHPyv (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Dec 2018 10:54:51 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wB8FsRbS024393; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 09:54:27 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1544284467; bh=IK03sP+Dmfhbg9UpgUqQ66hnrHYA6YH0bs5Gw6heFu4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=qz0Pa6xuMMSk9bDRbZn3QD4hc5ITtcbSSuKaLXF7RyFHx9NHFmT5ffroo5t6eZSYq Rs4jDvthIvuEhK1McTv6/k221ZUjkLijEoLrMXeTrYv68lkGypaCFeVI+Vd1TRR5lN 99ntTr/sbNWUZTSYs7uKmo1WGQ7f9czAoo82cZE4= Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (dlee107.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.37]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wB8FsRCV112156 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 8 Dec 2018 09:54:27 -0600 Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 09:54:27 -0600 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 09:54:27 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wB8FsQUv024248; Sat, 8 Dec 2018 09:54:27 -0600 Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 09:54:27 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Faiz Abbas CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am654-base-board: Add MMC/SD support Message-ID: <20181208155427.jmidz4vsw4k4qj36@akan> References: <20181207084233.13700-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20181207084233.13700-3-faiz_abbas@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181207084233.13700-3-faiz_abbas@ti.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14:12-20181207, Faiz Abbas wrote: > + > +&sdhci0 { > + status = "okay"; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&main_mmc0_pins_default>; > + bus-width = <8>; > + non-removable; > + ti,driver-strength-ohm = <50>; ^^ > +}; > + > +&sdhci1 { > + status = "okay"; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&main_mmc1_pins_default>; > + ti,driver-strength-ohm = <50>; NAK. $ git checkout next-20181207 $ git grep ti,driver-strength-ohm Documentation $ Nada.. And.. I think "new phy binding" probably introduces this. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mmc/list/?series=53185 If your patches are'nt really ready, please send them as RFC, I am not really in a mood to track the status of every single driver subsystem. If your binding is not in linux next at the baremin, as far as I am concerned, this is not ready, and should be RFC. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon