linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] sh: ftrace: Use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() instead of curr_ret_stack
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:30:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210193335.284057850@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20181210193007.655970639@goodmis.org

From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

[
  Folks, I'm working on rewriting the function graph tracer. In order to
  do so, some changes need to be done that affect architecture specific
  code. I'm only able to compile test these changes. I would like to
  have folks check out my repo and give them a test.

    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git
  ftrace/core

  Head SHA1: 51584396cff54aaf57ed0bd353767d71429f77b4
]

The structure of the ret_stack array on the task struct is going to
change, and accessing it directly via the curr_ret_stack index will no
longer give the ret_stack entry that holds the return address. To access
that, architectures must now use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() to get the
associated ret_stack that matches the saved return address.

Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c | 11 +++++++----
 arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c     |  9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c
index b564b1eae4ae..2c2e151bf39e 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -59,17 +59,20 @@ print_ftrace_graph_addr(unsigned long addr, void *data,
 			struct thread_info *tinfo, int *graph)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = tinfo->task;
+	struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack;
 	unsigned long ret_addr;
-	int index = task->curr_ret_stack;
 
 	if (addr != (unsigned long)return_to_handler)
 		return;
 
-	if (!task->ret_stack || index < *graph)
+	if (!task->ret_stack)
 		return;
 
-	index -= *graph;
-	ret_addr = task->ret_stack[index].ret;
+	ret_stack = ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(task, *graph);
+	if (!ret_stack)
+		return;
+
+	ret_addr = ret_stack->ret;
 
 	ops->address(data, ret_addr, 1);
 
diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c b/arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c
index bb511e2d9d68..df0fd6efe758 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c
@@ -608,17 +608,18 @@ struct dwarf_frame *dwarf_unwind_stack(unsigned long pc,
 	 * expected to find the real return address.
 	 */
 	if (pc == (unsigned long)&return_to_handler) {
-		int index = current->curr_ret_stack;
+		struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack;
 
+		ret_stack = ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(current, 0);
+		if (ret_stack)
+			pc = ret_stack->ret;
 		/*
 		 * We currently have no way of tracking how many
 		 * return_to_handler()'s we've seen. If there is more
 		 * than one patched return address on our stack,
 		 * complain loudly.
 		 */
-		WARN_ON(index > 0);
-
-		pc = current->ret_stack[index].ret;
+		WARN_ON(ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(current, 1);
 	}
 #endif
 
-- 
2.19.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-10 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-10 19:30 [PATCH 0/6] tracing / arch: Remove direct use of curr_ret_stack Steven Rostedt
2018-12-10 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] fgraph: Add comment to describe ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack Steven Rostedt
2018-12-10 19:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/ftrace: Do not call function graph from dynamic trampolines Steven Rostedt
2018-12-10 19:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/frace: Use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() instead of curr_ret_stack Steven Rostedt
2018-12-10 19:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] sparc64: " Steven Rostedt
2018-12-10 19:30 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-12-10 19:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: " Steven Rostedt
2018-12-13 17:09   ` James Morse
2018-12-15  3:00     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-17 13:30       ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181210193335.284057850@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).