From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A0AC5CFFE for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC9420870 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:46:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544543162; bh=14GOvzjcQlAF0wBBWwK0HtL0LQ4dwYbkAD5xhKvu4VE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=v6NtM6BcV2M4AKcgwb547jXcyZwjzFul9P4SisJT3fdh/RSRHnjJTlijEUHCB2+F3 lhYVkeRnjWyE+5cMmFLX3enmwjWQLly0w3sPTjCNehuGEwtjeAZUn8pDFlvDXneZqP MWwaftWG9+9r3Tk4X3tO0RL9JtUBF8KIIYwT3ivs= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8AC9420870 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728246AbeLKPqB (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:46:01 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34312 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728224AbeLKPp4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:45:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8866C21104; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:45:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544543156; bh=14GOvzjcQlAF0wBBWwK0HtL0LQ4dwYbkAD5xhKvu4VE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tqZU+ATdDGle1p67H3i8oyl1vYDrpdEk+Mh/COGIxL25wRHrzGpkISavtoU7FIzRq 0cHIOCmIKTMMxWZMUbUSKQlJCIE+Esk5BIh9+THD1SbJ5hLvWWuIsriIgDu50zXf98 2kqKWea3sFa/pIRyAgsYqN1QTuBTGK8g/MgLZfoQ= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Parri , Oleg Nesterov , Alexander Shishkin , Andrew Morton , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Linus Torvalds , Namhyung Kim , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian , Thomas Gleixner , Vince Weaver , stable@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: [PATCH 4.4 33/91] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs. unregister() + register() race once more Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:40:52 +0100 Message-Id: <20181211151608.463823962@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.0 In-Reply-To: <20181211151606.026852373@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181211151606.026852373@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Andrea Parri commit 09d3f015d1e1b4fee7e9bbdcf54201d239393391 upstream. Commit: 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race") added the UPROBE_COPY_INSN flag, and corresponding smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() memory barriers, to ensure that handle_swbp() uses fully-initialized uprobes only. However, the smp_rmb() is mis-placed: this barrier should be placed after handle_swbp() has tested for the flag, thus guaranteeing that (program-order) subsequent loads from the uprobe can see the initial stores performed by prepare_uprobe(). Move the smp_rmb() accordingly. Also amend the comments associated to the two memory barriers to indicate their actual locations. Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181122161031.15179-1-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/events/uprobes.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int prepare_uprobe(struct uprobe BUG_ON((uprobe->offset & ~PAGE_MASK) + UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE); - smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb() in find_active_uprobe() */ + smp_wmb(); /* pairs with the smp_rmb() in handle_swbp() */ set_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags); out: @@ -1892,10 +1892,18 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs * * After we hit the bp, _unregister + _register can install the * new and not-yet-analyzed uprobe at the same address, restart. */ - smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb() in install_breakpoint() */ if (unlikely(!test_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags))) goto out; + /* + * Pairs with the smp_wmb() in prepare_uprobe(). + * + * Guarantees that if we see the UPROBE_COPY_INSN bit set, then + * we must also see the stores to &uprobe->arch performed by the + * prepare_uprobe() call. + */ + smp_rmb(); + /* Tracing handlers use ->utask to communicate with fetch methods */ if (!get_utask()) goto out;