From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C1AC6786C for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE70214D9 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:08:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544789312; bh=DJuJpRRTpFkuh+0WmvBMYsbOU9wtmdnZKrofnAKAfmw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=Q69GyXcTJH/5Cw2+BXJnbPCly179NmaNadVzO2dYCCN+bHJm9RyQTao3ILj9SjVPz PnVL6phxX+eiFv+YS3EUaIi3SzSEL4uehwTqG1g3Lb8G6wzuUjxTgYXRajsviLia07 Lr5PsrXsLfZ8cs6Y0O7YN1zvusPAkSO5E/J77pEE= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6CE70214D9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730550AbeLNMIa (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:08:30 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53860 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731259AbeLNMIZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:08:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B6D4214AE; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:08:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544789305; bh=DJuJpRRTpFkuh+0WmvBMYsbOU9wtmdnZKrofnAKAfmw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=1k7Ti2JlpQGsayPUcuhE8Pfs7XYxknnaAUYEp9Gs6ZV2GIOggasM0b87K951coLEH dWJMVX/q+tueoGvNKvlAXlVO0uFTWB/m69jbfohZds/JPXu1hsJahqOtIRy0YeVJlU +FI43/VgJFi7YTRT0M2S3O+UKn88LiGsbQREgRn8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Taehee Yoo , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 31/89] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: fix a possible memory leak in htable_create() Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:59:44 +0100 Message-Id: <20181214115731.228742419@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.0 In-Reply-To: <20181214115729.658859279@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181214115729.658859279@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit b4e955e9f372035361fbc6f07b21fe2cc6a5be4a ] In the htable_create(), hinfo is allocated by vmalloc() So that if error occurred, hinfo should be freed. Fixes: 11d5f15723c9 ("netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Create revision 2 to support higher pps rates") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c index 0c034597b9b8..fe8e8a1622b5 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c @@ -295,9 +295,10 @@ static int htable_create(struct net *net, struct hashlimit_cfg3 *cfg, /* copy match config into hashtable config */ ret = cfg_copy(&hinfo->cfg, (void *)cfg, 3); - - if (ret) + if (ret) { + vfree(hinfo); return ret; + } hinfo->cfg.size = size; if (hinfo->cfg.max == 0) @@ -814,7 +815,6 @@ hashlimit_mt_v1(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_action_param *par) int ret; ret = cfg_copy(&cfg, (void *)&info->cfg, 1); - if (ret) return ret; @@ -830,7 +830,6 @@ hashlimit_mt_v2(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_action_param *par) int ret; ret = cfg_copy(&cfg, (void *)&info->cfg, 2); - if (ret) return ret; @@ -920,7 +919,6 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_v1(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) return ret; ret = cfg_copy(&cfg, (void *)&info->cfg, 1); - if (ret) return ret; @@ -939,7 +937,6 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_v2(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) return ret; ret = cfg_copy(&cfg, (void *)&info->cfg, 2); - if (ret) return ret; -- 2.19.1