From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=vePq=O3=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,
	USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2756C43387
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:24:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9962121871
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:24:21 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="Qwq4jMS9"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726740AbeLRPYU (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:24:20 -0500
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:48200 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726379AbeLRPYU (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:24:20 -0500
Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BD17800C11009BD73D4094D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bd1:7800:c110:9bd:73d4:94d])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 285281EC0629;
        Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:24:19 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
        t=1545146659;
        h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
         to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
        bh=WiI6Cwb5uZxuV1PBAluk7NuN00HlrCKbo6BN3NUAdeA=;
        b=Qwq4jMS9Pt+LQxCRIdJaV5zQR1mRF9L2GHQppAcimZtUvzXnTKJBqb2QwfAL7fPvGVEQpP
        jyRXRaqDhQP0T+HV4xEP8CtCszwm4jQcjpnr/SZyliieYRGeEvC2SwVUyo95v8z6xKz1jB
        +8zaHJXQ37EXThh533WAwf7OsZ1SvyM=
Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:24:13 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] printk: increase devkmsg write() ratelimit
Message-ID: <20181218152413.GJ7485@zn.tnic>
References: <20181218091842.4996-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
 <20181218104812.GC15430@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20181218111701.GA32522@jagdpanzerIV>
 <20181218114709.GF7485@zn.tnic>
 <20181218130750.GA665@tigerII.localdomain>
 <20181218142623.GH7485@zn.tnic>
 <20181218145558.GD665@tigerII.localdomain>
 <20181218150313.GI7485@zn.tnic>
 <20181218151455.GE665@tigerII.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181218151455.GE665@tigerII.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 12:14:55AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Right, but unlike log_buf_len, devkmsg is a bit close to a "binary" knob:
> either all messages or none;

... which is perfectly fine for a debugging session.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.