Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm: Remove use of drm_mode_object

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 07:28:36PM -0200, Shayenne Moura wrote:
> This patch removes the drm_mode_object prints, evaluation and use from
> drm_display_mode objects used in drm files. It removes dependency from
> drm_mode_object.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shayenne Moura <shayenneluzmoura@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c | 5 ++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c       | 5 -----
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> index a3c81850e755..cc5cc8d109a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> @@ -386,9 +386,8 @@ bool drm_crtc_helper_set_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  		if (!encoder_funcs)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s] set [MODE:%d:%s]\n",
> -			encoder->base.id, encoder->name,
> -			mode->base.id, mode->name);
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s] set [MODE:%s]\n",
> +			encoder->base.id, encoder->name, mode->name);
>  		if (encoder_funcs->mode_set)
>  			encoder_funcs->mode_set(encoder, mode, adjusted_mode);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> index 24a750436559..e2689afdcf50 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> @@ -71,11 +71,6 @@ struct drm_display_mode *drm_mode_create(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	if (!nmode)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	if (drm_mode_object_add(dev, &nmode->base, DRM_MODE_OBJECT_MODE)) {
> -		kfree(nmode);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}

You seem to have lost the 3rd hunk here compared to the previous version.

For reordering patches the best way is to use 

$ git rebase --interactive

which fires up a text editor where you can reorder the patches as you see
fit. That way you don't have to touch them and risk breaking something.

Another thing: When resending patches unchanged, and your previous version
has received r-b/a-b tags, please include them. That way people know what
still needs to be reviewed and what is already reviewed. I think there was
also some other patches than this one that I reviewed already, can you pls
redo the patch series with r-b tags included, patch commit log (where you
did change something) added and then resend?

Threading looks good now.

Thanks, Daniel

> -
>  	return nmode;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_create);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch