From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3542C43387 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B239E20873 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:49:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1546001350; bh=Fvaz5kHbWoU2hcomRafWjmAvnKC+g1veMxWhIuZlnbM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=s+gIOP3tGQrzYeLGvCNkqUxKAL19sBNxXd3h29UdsSgI8qVEgfwJA82RJepJzzLIz N6mk/cVwn3O8JtDqj7HJ7o9dMRpkTyjTx/0BD+1kloMeAz+2UnDZmuprma3ItCvs+4 LJWXw6O3Nrbx+vJhrXgvqDwpM8UwaqKo+9TMCZQ4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729971AbeL1MtJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2018 07:49:09 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com ([209.85.128.65]:36713 "EHLO mail-wm1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729832AbeL1MtJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2018 07:49:09 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id p6so19664716wmc.1 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 04:49:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pDuBV0J8gEFUT2C/YG5kiHgW3KPzlCz/R9KpBQIhxyI=; b=We33a4w5WnnII+Y5qnYMweAedkgXDus1bEspQd9bGZ54lh1GRijGsmMgwJK7PmJUHg PRWJXQnsBlotNBwxkUMAwrtjCzWfnYvRV6qNUZvJpia4p/lTwFTh1c7dXeMTx99oe9Kj 4TNQ+XbHqlr8imVzdI3PMX9fN8U3lH7mlmH4XfeYFMTQP+0W5p2FVNIizjP2z6oR1W1r fIG7hgiUNM9874D2TsO2d2b9Afdk2tdOz9GcrV5nAH1rcQM5yEa56Z5Xme3W4whd8CWF nxk1CC1v7XKcycP9yeB4sQgM11zZRzIFxyqkLIkYldqIMQni/5KiYscoszlPdbPG8T91 e0kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pDuBV0J8gEFUT2C/YG5kiHgW3KPzlCz/R9KpBQIhxyI=; b=BAa0KkRBhRSCYJw48Bt/rF6Uu5QSYeEY0qjISTejdjd+aQ9/TI3gvwnP2f14SKJM0T fIro5ryGWiFkG3ABn9DuK9vafyO05ZJNnB3ndwvDFmmmWw3yrIKgP6MRhR4VtSeHpiHN ckdbyWsyNVDCBsl1GeaeLfRWU5HcwRgKYlG6SB1+lgbb49EqdhnhyQC69w9fJV0jvuaC XG6/eMt1XrHCe7z533eVp8VucFZMDkE/Eu1wxvvR7EDWxE61meJjPF0HAMuk063RQRzd ksLhP58wlgjkJc8bmVBI3HtpN4b0XNfzqQiOwf9ig+/6wsttsWXzO05WO6iO7/+04azh Pfqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaPYti/UGqF+JtVS/4eW3ndITOEbxvOqasFkHpVHtih1qvyplPe +NBHEUCV9G4KB3wkP2zuYdCEvFD2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN55d0xTeex4+uyOE1A63PYCyW7+STilngDfizLwBIZnaUrurvEAJW0vXIDcV4R+vLA2Tyq5WA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd85:: with SMTP id y5mr23025356wmj.129.1546001347239; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 04:49:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (2E8B0CD5.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [46.139.12.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m193sm28201335wmb.26.2018.12.28.04.49.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Dec 2018 04:49:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 13:49:04 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Linus Torvalds , x86-ml , lkml , James Morse Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/cache updates for 4.21 Message-ID: <20181228124904.GC20003@gmail.com> References: <20181223124859.GA26860@zn.tnic> <20181226205616.GA4557@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181226205616.GA4557@zn.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:26:12PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I've pulled this, but I think the new config option name is bad. > > > > I think it should probably have been called "X86_RESCTRL" instead of > > just "RESCTRL". That's way too generic a name for something that is > > (at least currently) very much an x86 feature. > > Right you are... ... and it's almost as if someone complained about this already: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/23/389 "Also, the Kconfig space, when it gets extended with the AMD bits, should probably follow the same nomenclature: CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESOURCE_CONTROL=yor such." ;-) Anyway, I kind of dropped the ball after that first round of complaints, should have looked again. Thanks, Ingo