From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28338C43387 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 17:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37C72075D for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 17:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726245AbfAARxN (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:53:13 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:48708 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726203AbfAARxM (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:53:12 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x01Hn0R3059737 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:53:11 -0500 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2prb94b6qn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 12:53:10 -0500 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 17:53:10 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.27) by e17.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.204) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 1 Jan 2019 17:53:06 -0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x01Hr5qg22151328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Jan 2019 17:53:05 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44734B205F; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 17:53:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2360BB2064; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 17:53:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.85.153.1]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 17:53:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 843DC16C3373; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:53:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 09:53:22 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Junchang Wang Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, josh@joshtriplett.org, corbet@lwn.net, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] whatisRCU.txt: fix outdated links Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com References: <1546351400-16389-1-git-send-email-junchangwang@gmail.com> <1546351400-16389-2-git-send-email-junchangwang@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1546351400-16389-2-git-send-email-junchangwang@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19010117-0040-0000-0000-000004AB0911 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010329; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000272; SDB=6.01140282; UDB=6.00592163; IPR=6.00920497; MB=3.00024931; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-01-01 17:53:08 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19010117-0041-0000-0000-000008B60FDA Message-Id: <20190101175322.GV4170@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-01_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901010163 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 10:03:19PM +0800, Junchang Wang wrote: > Fix outdated links in whatisRCU.txt. > > Signed-off-by: Junchang Wang Queued and pushed, thank you! Thanx, Paul > --- > Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt > index 4a68543..1ace208 100644 > --- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt > @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ rcu_dereference() > must prohibit. The rcu_dereference_protected() variant takes > a lockdep expression to indicate which locks must be acquired > by the caller. If the indicated protection is not provided, > - a lockdep splat is emitted. See RCU/Design/Requirements.html > + a lockdep splat is emitted. See RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html > and the API's code comments for more details and example usage. > > The following diagram shows how each API communicates among the > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ presents two such "toy" implementations of RCU, one that is implemented > in terms of familiar locking primitives, and another that more closely > resembles "classic" RCU. Both are way too simple for real-world use, > lacking both functionality and performance. However, they are useful > -in getting a feel for how RCU works. See kernel/rcupdate.c for a > +in getting a feel for how RCU works. See kernel/rcu/update.c for a > production-quality implementation, and see: > > http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU > -- > 2.7.4 >