From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9350C43387 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B932183E for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728064AbfAGR7V (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:59:21 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35956 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726878AbfAGR7V (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:59:21 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E653F15AB; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 09:59:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4616A3F5A0; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 09:59:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:59:11 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Mark Brown Cc: Anders Roxell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm64: add a new config option KTEST_RUNNABLE Message-ID: <20190107175911.GA11863@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20181213122910.24193-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20181213122910.24193-4-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20190107144356.GB46743@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20190107175531.GN9570@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190107175531.GN9570@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+11 (2f07cb52) (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 05:55:31PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:43:57PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > Is it possible to use an allyesconfig rather than an allmodconfig? That > > would leave all relevant options built-in. > > The allyesconfig would make it more difficult to apply this approach to > real hardware which is part of the goal here - the idea was to come up > with a way of making runnable configurations which are likely to be > usable with random userspace testsuites in order to avoid needing ever > expanding combinations of builds. Ok. Is it somehow possible to fuse defconfig with an allmodconfig, with defconfig's CONFIG_FOO=y taking precedence over allmodconfig's CONFIG_FOO=m? IIUC, that would give you the necessary platform bits, at least for anything supported by defconfig. That would also happen to get CONFIG_UNIX=y, too. Thanks, Mark.