From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: andy.gross@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, collinsd@codeaurora.org,
mka@chromium.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
henryc.chen@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/10] dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-level bindings
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:19:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190108044958.katgnp4ozmpqien2@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190107100959.14528-2-rnayak@codeaurora.org>
On 07-01-19, 15:39, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On some SoCs (especially from Qualcomm and MediaTek) an OPP
> node needs to describe an additional level/corner value
> that is then communicated to a remote microprocessor by the CPU, which
> then takes some actions (like adjusting voltage values across various rails)
> based on the value passed.
>
> Describe these bindings in the opp-level bindings document.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-level.txt | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-level.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-level.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-level.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f9134ed08164
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-level.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +OPP level bindings to descibe OPP nodes with corner/level values
> +
> +OPP tables for devices on some SoCs, especially from Qualcomm and
> +MediaTek require an additional platform specific corner/level
> +value to be specified.
> +This value is passed on to a Power Manager by
> +the CPU, which then takes the necessary actions to set a voltage
> +rail to an appropriate voltage based on the value passed.
> +
> +The bindings are based on top of the operating-points-v2 bindings
> +described in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt,
> +with the exception that all of the properties are now optional,
> +including the opp-hz property.
> +
> +Additional properties are described below.
> +
> +* OPP Table Node
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: Allow OPPs to express their compatibility. It should be:
> + "operating-points-v2-level"
All this isn't required. Just define it as a regular property in
opp.txt only, just like opp-hz or something else.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-08 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-07 10:09 [PATCH v9 00/10] Add power domain driver for corners on msm8996/sdm845 Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-level bindings Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-08 4:49 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] dt-bindings: power: Add qcom rpm power domain driver bindings Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add a Power domain driver to model corners Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add support for get/set performance state Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] arm64: dts: msm8996: Add rpmpd device node Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add RPMh power domain driver Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add rpmh powercontroller node Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] OPP: Add a dev_pm_opp_of_get_level() helper Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-08 4:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Use " Rajendra Nayak
2019-01-07 10:09 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Mark mx as a parent for cx Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190108044958.katgnp4ozmpqien2@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=henryc.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).