From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFC6C43387 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14AE2087F for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="F9xzdgpF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728282AbfAHJta (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 04:49:30 -0500 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:53022 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727001AbfAHJta (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 04:49:30 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x089nL8u009815; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:49:22 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=CCZqnBr5X7fUulrz391lwnnp0fmZ0BbuU5v5+BAhJtE=; b=F9xzdgpFtUqZF/lEldJuFWyqimA04JdKqI1ffUYf08+hDgBG6Qjv6W5Z5z16M3U303PT l11V9Ck4b9I7WBB/rinH/oC/6lu+wQx3q36u5F4z6ebhun7VIS8FHxmvq4B/9LMEp/UL D33ze1YOACsJc8o1HsqOKc8QjZRtkbsTnWLZmgHZ1QJZXCwY986ZIAF5DTHzLbjzjhFC 4zyDIp3ea537/75VORQFJRHH3kwTz7xffmwFj8zOJlv8cBtEX/WKnF4hRv5V7cOcTecx BuHBkQtTnqkcLvA8x5ZSJO05WT4Y170zX3tsfHRj+/AhPCj2P41axsf+Q24e9tQRokk6 Zw== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2ptm0u2jwg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 08 Jan 2019 09:49:22 +0000 Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x089nL6U029562 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:49:21 GMT Received: from abhmp0020.oracle.com (abhmp0020.oracle.com [141.146.116.26]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x089nLNv016744; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:49:21 GMT Received: from kadam (/197.157.0.45) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 01:49:21 -0800 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:47:55 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: Sasha Levin , Stephen Hemminger , David Hildenbrand , Haiyang Zhang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_balloon: avoid touching uninitialized struct page during tail onlining Message-ID: <20190108094755.GG3200@kadam> References: <20190104141942.19126-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <2ea7e975-6aae-de71-83e5-9302518802ef@redhat.com> <87d0p837lt.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20190107175650.GG166797@sasha-vm> <87a7kc2u03.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a7kc2u03.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9129 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=702 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901080081 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:38:20PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > (I remember Greg disliked when people were tagging patches for stable@ > themselves, he prefered maintainers deciding if the particular commit > deserves stable@ or not - but as you have a tree now we may as well have > different rules :-) You're thinking of Dave Miller. So far as I know he's the only maintainer who handles stable that way. It's a lot of work to do the things Dave does. #understatement regards, dan carpenter