From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A650C43387 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6652B2084C for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391897AbfAKPGM (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:06:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55178 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389267AbfAKPGH (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:06:07 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD337AE8B; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.18.25.149]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC8860920; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:06:05 -0500 From: Mike Snitzer To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lin , Christoph Hellwig , Xiao Ni , Mariusz Dabrowski , Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , Sudip Mukherjee Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 72/88] block: dont deal with discard limit in blkdev_issue_discard() Message-ID: <20190111150605.GA10771@redhat.com> References: <20190111131045.137499039@linuxfoundation.org> <20190111131058.120784730@linuxfoundation.org> <20190111142539.GA10601@redhat.com> <20190111143514.GA8530@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190111143514.GA8530@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 11 2019 at 9:35am -0500, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:25:39AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11 2019 at 9:08am -0500, > > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > From: Ming Lei > > > > > > commit 744889b7cbb56a64f957e65ade7cb65fe3f35714 upstream. > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Please also pick up this commit: > > 89f5fa47476eda56402e29fff3c5097f5c2a1e19 ("dm: call blk_queue_split() to > > impose device limits on bios") > > That's going to be hard as the dependancy for that patch is not here in > 4.4.y, and this patch itself isn't even in anything older than 4.19.y. Right, I quickly replied to this thread with followup of the 3 prereq patches needed to get 89f5fa47476 to apply. > So why add it here to 4.4.y only? Because you're looking to pull in a commit into 4.4 that causes problems elsewhere. > Can you send the needed patch series to the stable@ mailing list for the > different stable trees if this needs to get into them? I'll try to get to that, but it is low priority for me. And in the meantime.. DM will be broken in 4.4 if you take 744889b7cb.. wheeeee. Mike