From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B92C43387 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97481206B7 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="EiD2ok1L" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727033AbfANN1U (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 08:27:20 -0500 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:37584 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726559AbfANN1R (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 08:27:17 -0500 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0EDQc6x098319; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 07:26:38 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1547472398; bh=WBTdWRfYLKWv54dEuesWhlPv+Ca+Oa1+3N9tCdOgMMQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=EiD2ok1L6yzy+FmC75cU6k4+yTVtgx09w/7qmefhAVIHquBjNjL85yvF4VQM/RG69 owmV21aQxFDSOw1jfbwF3NzIHgYRrZYzP1+SXZ7COZmWEWznnYpM7bSxwO++APcuVu NjB7RjSCavhu1EofazTRK4/ErdxF6Grh0Qj01iP4= Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (dlee109.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.41]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0EDQcBO012761 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 07:26:38 -0600 Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 07:26:37 -0600 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 07:26:38 -0600 Received: from a0393678ub.india.ti.com (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x0EDOoWh028516; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 07:26:33 -0600 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I To: Gustavo Pimentel , Rob Herring , Lorenzo Pieralisi CC: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Jingoo Han , Bjorn Helgaas , Mark Rutland , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Murali Karicheri , Jesper Nilsson , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH 21/24] PCI: designware-ep: Configure RESBAR to advertise the smallest size Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 18:54:21 +0530 Message-ID: <20190114132424.6445-22-kishon@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190114132424.6445-1-kishon@ti.com> References: <20190114132424.6445-1-kishon@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Configure RESBAR capability to advertise the smallest size (1MB) for couple of reasons. A) Host side resource allocation of BAR fails for larger sizes. B) Endpoint function driver does not allocate memory for all supported sizes in RESBAR capability. If and when there is a usecase required to add more flexibility using RESBAR, this can be revisited. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I --- .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c index cd51b008858c..47cc06bac91f 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c @@ -502,10 +502,32 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_exit(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) pci_epc_mem_exit(epc); } +static unsigned int dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability(struct dw_pcie *pci, int cap) +{ + u32 header; + int pos = PCI_CFG_SPACE_SIZE; + + while (pos) { + header = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, pos); + if (PCI_EXT_CAP_ID(header) == cap) + return pos; + + pos = PCI_EXT_CAP_NEXT(header); + if (!pos) + break; + } + + return 0; +} + int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) { + int i; int ret; + u32 reg; void *addr; + unsigned int nbars; + unsigned int offset; struct pci_epc *epc; struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); struct device *dev = pci->dev; @@ -589,6 +611,18 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) ep->msix_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX); + offset = dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability(pci, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR); + if (offset) { + reg = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL); + nbars = (reg & PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_MASK) >> + PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_SHIFT; + + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci); + for (i = 0; i < nbars; i++, offset += PCI_REBAR_CTRL) + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_REBAR_CAP, 0x0); + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci); + } + dw_pcie_setup(pci); return 0; -- 2.17.1