From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F00C43387 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 03:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1A620645 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 03:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727856AbfAODQ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:16:28 -0500 Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:35432 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727529AbfAODQ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:16:28 -0500 Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x0F3GFtF006436; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:16:15 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:16:15 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Mark Brown Cc: Silvio Cesare , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Dan Carpenter , Kees Cook , Will Deacon , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ASoC: dapm: change snprintf to scnprintf for possible overflow Message-ID: <20190115031615.GB6416@1wt.eu> References: <20190112152844.26550-1-w@1wt.eu> <20190112152844.26550-7-w@1wt.eu> <20190114145650.GD11073@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190114145650.GD11073@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 02:56:50PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 04:28:43PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > From: Silvio Cesare > > > > Change snprintf to scnprintf. There are generally two cases where using > > snprintf causes problems. > > I don't have a cover letter or anything before this in the series. > What's going on with dependencies here? Sorry for the lack of more context, I was just involved in putting a subject line on each patch and passing them through get_maintainers.pl. These ones were sent to the security list after this article was published: http://blog.infosectcbr.com.au/2018/11/memory-bugs-in-multiple-linux-kernel.html Thanks, Willy