From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A84C43387 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E242620851 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728083AbfAQPsY (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:48:24 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:38166 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727002AbfAQPsX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:48:23 -0500 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2005) id EAFF368CEB; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:48:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:48:21 +0100 From: Torsten Duwe To: Julien Thierry Cc: Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Steven Rostedt , Josh Poimboeuf , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , AKASHI Takahiro , Amit Daniel Kachhap , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: implement ftrace with regs Message-ID: <20190117154821.GC9094@lst.de> References: <20190104141053.360F768D93@newverein.lst.de> <8eb70db4-92a2-95a2-075c-f26690aab3ed@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8eb70db4-92a2-95a2-075c-f26690aab3ed@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:57:39AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote: > > I wanted to test this patch (and try to benchmark having the "mov x9, > x30" always present in function prelude vs having two nops), but I > cannot get this patch to apply (despite having a version including both > commits below). > > Could you provide a git branch from which I could try to rebase the > patch? (Or a new version of the series) It also applies with just a single, harmless fuzz 1 onto 5.0-rc2. Does that help? I'm currently over v7, with Mark's requests included and the mov patching done only once at bootup... Torsten