From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93393C43387 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D7C20652 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:51:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547794273; bh=1rr2Jz/fQkwt2Il67J0sj5BgStMYgTxGjU8bWFKmvF8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=0UdN/cIVGOe7bj+VrPPag7fqXm/oUzNeih05EAVKeSQtbdy20r7qr9jHAQS5cOu7Q QJCtE8Zw559i4VdfUi8FO0DPVTH2vLmZBl10dg6vYJLr+619AflJtPHmgia9L3sZF5 baZs+ywPYvpLJ7tJ7abzCT1N9Lv+8T01c2MPDF8I= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727178AbfARGvC (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2019 01:51:02 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44314 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726962AbfARGvB (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2019 01:51:01 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F1FE20652; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:51:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547794261; bh=1rr2Jz/fQkwt2Il67J0sj5BgStMYgTxGjU8bWFKmvF8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FShB/LN0FdOEUFxU0x9akHgQu52sZ3N2vJ+Dn1HlYNJ+j4zIcN62wpU/h+KebllNH wLe2DswzhRlqDpLzVBCW9ttf6lwfyoOw9HSEMxariCE6SXtHqIN+eq2mEFim00J1jc 4D2w+VtSRK5Xvg5QvGGYAGI9jo3Rk8l35EYi447U= Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:50:58 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Fabio Estevam Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Kate Stewart , Jonathan Corbet , Ondrej Mosnacek , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" Subject: Re: [patch 3/9] crypto: morus - Cleanup license mess Message-ID: <20190118065058.GA9727@kroah.com> References: <20190117231416.111952141@linutronix.de> <20190117231501.068505479@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:26:07PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 9:17 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > --- a/include/crypto/morus1280_glue.h > > +++ b/include/crypto/morus1280_glue.h > > @@ -1,15 +1,10 @@ > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > > Shouldn't this be: /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */ ? > > At least this is the form documented in Documentation/process/license-rules.rst: > > " License identifiers for licenses like [L]GPL with the 'or later' option > are constructed by using a "+" for indicating the 'or later' option.:: > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+" Either works, please see LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 Personally, I think we should stick with the "+" version as that is the much more prevalent use in the kernel at the moment, but it's Thomas's call, not mine. thanks, greg k-h