linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	tfiga@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for non-coherent page table mappings
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 00:01:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190120000117.GH26876@brain-police> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190117092718.1396-3-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 02:57:18PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Adding a device tree option for arm smmu to enable non-cacheable
> memory for page tables.
> We already enable a smmu feature for coherent walk based on
> whether the smmu device is dma-coherent or not. Have an option
> to enable non-cacheable page table memory to force set it for
> particular smmu devices.

Hmm, I must be missing something here. What is the difference between this
new property, and simply omitting dma-coherent on the SMMU?

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-20  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-17  9:27 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/arm: Add support for non-coherent page tables Vivek Gautam
2019-01-17  9:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: " Vivek Gautam
2019-01-21 13:12   ` Robin Murphy
2019-01-28 12:20     ` Vivek Gautam
2019-01-17  9:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for non-coherent page table mappings Vivek Gautam
2019-01-20  0:01   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-01-21  6:05     ` Vivek Gautam
2019-01-22  5:43       ` Will Deacon
2019-01-29 10:43         ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190120000117.GH26876@brain-police \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).