From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CB8C282C3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D2C217D6 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="fGaHEIcz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726468AbfAVVNv (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:13:51 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:44022 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726214AbfAVVNv (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:13:51 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id a11so24996294otr.10 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:13:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SXGfUfbqkWROu34b5v4AYgOrxsUcGJH357ltlGyo9L8=; b=fGaHEIczp0cXNaFIbGcNfyeUizHfqDTXJY7FuDAq19uVL9wqv16RGKUpni8Iuykx/l XpiGlTlzPsj+wdrbE//KHRHBmmuSxEFG+Rs7UfuCdbvaXlo6WcJyBJkaeJY/50e2yemf ti/TnHbe42HnHLp4PyD/8CwpK4KgWdrKQ1Zvk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SXGfUfbqkWROu34b5v4AYgOrxsUcGJH357ltlGyo9L8=; b=nn+07pRq0fpFbhRoWYfaC7rO+9EMu/m1/8UxssX0z4JzSWhBZZWBSy5HbZ2ke6HQqg gaKRh3MdGAA+9RiDN8vhD1gxiqhq5le9pZ9nBXnLPmWK3/wkQG23oJrYEKlo6mdE4/VJ TljBDWubmWQI3h520DtJDZ1QLDseveHik1OJFJE2ssHdGDpy3aQe5JqO0KwoM5cPeX/J 2DBP7n3fbKhq/cb7QX1C2xxoqtHVZAHEjvAzT88qg1eKwGe0oiNNpKmtYw1nk25gyS28 DlmozucM5rTyf33WdYIFUz1SmbSw/C9hBqq24k8QJKqVvNSMkTXSyd/LxiD1TuE1yq59 Hq/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcYONLs/3In8O9OKwVtAd7s4KE0+DpomtpleC0J8Vg8z0kS+R0P JMbrRCTMkLqsMWsUL06QmTBO8w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6Mhuz9TYD+1xUjodUKIq3pdqnhXRGH3ckKMvm0gJwKp5J5dmRZM8DS/ZzyBF0F2kIe4sHZAw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1296:: with SMTP id g22mr21719223otg.305.1548191630466; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:13:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (107-207-74-175.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [107.207.74.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n185sm8065230oih.18.2019.01.22.13.13.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:13:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:13:46 -0600 From: Andy Gross To: Linus Walleij Cc: Brian Masney , Stephen Boyd , Bjorn Andersson , Marc Zyngier , Shawn Guo , Doug Anderson , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Nicolas Dechesne , Niklas Cassel , David Brown , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , "thierry.reding@gmail.com" , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] qcom: spmi: add support for hierarchical IRQ chip Message-ID: <20190122211346.GA30582@hector.attlocal.net> References: <20190119204252.18370-1-masneyb@onstation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:31:20PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 9:43 PM Brian Masney wrote: > > > This patch series adds hierarchical IRQ chip support to spmi-gpio so > > that device tree consumers can request an IRQ directly from the GPIO > > block rather than having to request an IRQ from the underlying PMIC. > > I have applied all these patches including the DTS patches to the GPIO > tree and pushed for linux-next. > > If all works out well I will solidify the branch, pull it into the pin control > tree as well and offer the branch to ARM SoC. Thanks Linus!