Hi, On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Add support for additional reset causes and the proper compatibility > string for sam9x60 SoC. The restart function is the same as the samx7. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > --- > drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c > index f44a9ffcc2ab..44ca983a49a1 100644 > --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c > +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ enum reset_type { > RESET_TYPE_WATCHDOG = 2, > RESET_TYPE_SOFTWARE = 3, > RESET_TYPE_USER = 4, > + RESET_TYPE_CPU_FAIL = 6, > + RESET_TYPE_XTAL_FAIL = 7, > + RESET_TYPE_ULP2 = 8, what happened to 5? :) > }; > > static void __iomem *at91_ramc_base[2], *at91_rstc_base; > @@ -164,6 +167,15 @@ static void __init at91_reset_status(struct platform_device *pdev) > case RESET_TYPE_USER: > reason = "user reset"; > break; > + case RESET_TYPE_CPU_FAIL: > + reason = "CPU clock failure detection"; > + break; > + case RESET_TYPE_XTAL_FAIL: > + reason = "32.768 kHz crystal failure detection"; > + break; > + case RESET_TYPE_ULP2: > + reason = "ULP2 reset"; > + break; > default: > reason = "unknown reset"; > break; > @@ -183,6 +195,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id at91_reset_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-rstc", .data = at91sam9g45_restart }, > { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-rstc", .data = sama5d3_restart }, > { .compatible = "atmel,samx7-rstc", .data = samx7_restart }, > + { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-rstc", .data = samx7_restart }, > { /* sentinel */ } > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_reset_of_match); Patch looks fine to me. But I will wait a bit with merging, so that Alexandre or Ludovic have a chance to provide feedback. -- Sebastian