linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Cc: Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: chemical: add support for Plantower PMS7003 sensor
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:08:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190123210828.GA18103@arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190112174822.25e36471@archlinux>

On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 05:48:22PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun,  6 Jan 2019 18:16:12 +0100
> Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Add support for Plantower PMS7003 particulate matter sensor.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com>
>
> A few minor bits and pieces from me.
>

Just one minor comment inline and ACK to all other improvements you
suggested.

> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/Kconfig   |  10 +
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/Makefile  |   1 +
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 422 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/chemical/Kconfig
> > index 57832b4360e9..d5d146e9e372 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/Kconfig
> > @@ -61,6 +61,16 @@ config IAQCORE
> >  	  iAQ-Core Continuous/Pulsed VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds)
> >  	  sensors
> >
> > +config PMS7003
> > +	tristate "Plantower PMS7003 particulate matter sensor"
> > +	depends on SERIAL_DEV_BUS
> > +	help
> > +	  Say Y here to build support for the Plantower PMS7003 particulate
> > +	  matter sensor.
> > +
> > +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
> > +	  be called pms7003.
> > +
> >  config SPS30
> >  	tristate "SPS30 particulate matter sensor"
> >  	depends on I2C
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/Makefile b/drivers/iio/chemical/Makefile
> > index 65bf0f89c0e4..f5d1365acb49 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/Makefile
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BME680_I2C) += bme680_i2c.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_BME680_SPI) += bme680_spi.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CCS811)		+= ccs811.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_IAQCORE)		+= ams-iaq-core.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PMS7003) += pms7003.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSIRION_SGP30)	+= sgp30.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SPS30) += sps30.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_VZ89X)		+= vz89x.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..bc8a4fbdf641
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Plantower PMS7003 particulate matter sensor driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > +
> > +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> > +#include <linux/completion.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/trigger_consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/triggered_buffer.h>
> > +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/serdev.h>
> > +
> > +#define PMS7003_DRIVER_NAME "pms7003"
> > +
> > +#define PMS7003_MAGIC_MSB 0x42
> > +#define PMS7003_MAGIC_LSB 0x4d
> > +/* last 2 data bytes hold frame checksum */
> > +#define PMS7003_MAX_DATA_LENGTH 28
> > +#define PMS7003_CHECKSUM_LENGTH 2
> > +#define PMS7003_PM10_OFFSET 10
> > +#define PMS7003_PM2P5_OFFSET 8
> > +#define PMS7003_PM1_OFFSET 6
> > +
> > +#define PMS7003_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(6000)
> > +#define PMS7003_CMD_LENGTH 7
> > +#define PMS7003_PM_MAX 1000
> > +#define PMS7003_PM_MIN 0
> > +
> > +enum {
> > +	PM1,
> > +	PM2P5,
> > +	PM10,
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum {
> > +	CMD_WAKEUP,
> > +	CMD_ENTER_PASSIVE_MODE,
> > +	CMD_READ_PASSIVE,
> > +	CMD_SLEEP,
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum {
> > +	STATE_MAGIC_MSB,
> > +	STATE_MAGIC_LSB,
> > +	STATE_LENGTH_MSB,
> > +	STATE_LENGTH_LSB,
> > +	STATE_DATA,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct pms7003_frame {
> > +	u8 data[PMS7003_MAX_DATA_LENGTH];
> > +	u16 expected_length;
> > +	u16 length;
> > +	int state;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct pms7003_state {
> > +	struct serdev_device *serdev;
> > +	struct pms7003_frame frame;
> > +	struct completion frame_ready;
> > +	struct mutex lock; /* must be held whenever state gets touched */
> > +};
> > +
> > +static u16 pms7003_calc_checksum(const u8 *data, int size)
> > +{
> > +	u16 checksum = 0;
> > +
> > +	while (size--)
> > +		checksum += data[size];
> > +
> > +	return checksum;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pms7003_do_cmd(struct pms7003_state *state, u8 cmd)
>
> Use the enum not u8.
>
> > +{
> > +	/*
> > +	 * commands have following format:
> > +	 *
> > +	 * +------+------+-----+------+-----+-----------+-----------+
> > +	 * | 0x42 | 0x4d | cmd | 0x00 | arg | cksum msb | cksum lsb |
> > +	 * +------+------+-----+------+-----+-----------+-----------+
> > +	 */
> > +	u8 tmp[PMS7003_CMD_LENGTH] = { PMS7003_MAGIC_MSB, PMS7003_MAGIC_LSB };
> > +	int ret, n = 2;
> > +	u16 checksum;
> > +
> > +	switch (cmd) {
> > +	case CMD_WAKEUP:
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0xe4;
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0x00;
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0x01;
> > +		break;
> > +	case CMD_ENTER_PASSIVE_MODE:
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0xe1;
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0x00;
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0x00;
> > +		break;
> > +	case CMD_READ_PASSIVE:
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0xe2;
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0x00;
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0x00;
> > +		break;
> > +	case CMD_SLEEP:
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0xe4;
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0x00;
> > +		tmp[n++] = 0x00;
>
> These look like they should be in a look up table to me rather than the more
> verbose switch statement.
>
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	checksum = pms7003_calc_checksum(tmp, n);
>
> This is fixed for all calls of a given command (I think).  If so, it would
> be good to precompute it (on startup for example, ideally letting the compiler
> figure it out if it can).
>
> > +	put_unaligned_be16(checksum, tmp + n);
> > +	n += PMS7003_CHECKSUM_LENGTH;
> > +
> > +	ret = serdev_device_write(state->serdev, tmp, n, PMS7003_TIMEOUT);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&state->frame_ready,
> > +							PMS7003_TIMEOUT);
> > +	if (!ret)
> > +		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +
> > +	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u16 pms7003_get_pm(struct pms7003_frame *frame, int offset)
> > +{
> > +	return clamp_val(get_unaligned_be16(frame->data + offset),
> > +			 PMS7003_PM_MIN, PMS7003_PM_MAX);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t pms7003_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > +{
> > +	struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> > +	struct pms7003_state *state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	struct pms7003_frame *frame = &state->frame;
> > +	u16 data[3 + 1 + 4]; /* PM1, PM2P5, PM10, padding, timestamp */
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&state->lock);
> > +	ret = pms7003_do_cmd(state, CMD_READ_PASSIVE);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
> > +		goto err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	data[PM1] = pms7003_get_pm(frame, PMS7003_PM1_OFFSET);
> > +	data[PM2P5] = pms7003_get_pm(frame, PMS7003_PM2P5_OFFSET);
> > +	data[PM10] = pms7003_get_pm(frame, PMS7003_PM10_OFFSET);
>
> > +	mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
> > +
> > +	iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data,
> > +					   iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
> > +err:
> > +	iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> > +
> > +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pms7003_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > +			    struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > +			    int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> > +{
> > +	struct pms7003_state *state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	struct pms7003_frame *frame = &state->frame;
>
> This local variable for the frame can go away once you make the other
> change suggested below.
>
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	switch (mask) {
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
> > +		switch (chan->type) {
> > +		case IIO_MASSCONCENTRATION:
> > +			mutex_lock(&state->lock);
>
> Will this interfere in any way with buffered operation?  I'd normally
> expect to see some claim_direct etc calls in here to prevent that.
>

In either case full data access is protected with a lock hence
I do not expect to see any surprises here.

> > +			ret = pms7003_do_cmd(state, CMD_READ_PASSIVE);
> > +			if (ret) {
> > +				mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
> > +				return ret;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			switch (chan->channel2) {
> > +			case IIO_MOD_PM1:
> > +				*val = pms7003_get_pm(frame,
> > +						      PMS7003_PM1_OFFSET);
>
> Put the PMS7003_PM1_OFFSET in the address element of the channel then
> you can get rid fo this switch statement.
>
> > +				break;
> > +			case IIO_MOD_PM2P5:
> > +				*val = pms7003_get_pm(frame,
> > +						      PMS7003_PM2P5_OFFSET);
> > +				break;
> > +			case IIO_MOD_PM10:
> > +				*val = pms7003_get_pm(frame,
> > +						      PMS7003_PM10_OFFSET);
> > +				break;
>
> Just possible some compiler will give us warnings for the lack of a default
> in here.  Might be worth putting one in to avoid that noise.
> Particularly as you already have one for the chan->type.
>
> > +			}
> > +			mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
> > +
> > +			return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +		default:
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_info pms7003_info = {
> > +	.read_raw = pms7003_read_raw,
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define PMS7003_CHAN(_index, _mod) { \
> > +	.type = IIO_MASSCONCENTRATION, \
> > +	.modified = 1, \
> > +	.channel2 = IIO_MOD_ ## _mod, \
> > +	.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED), \
> > +	.scan_index = _index, \
> > +	.scan_type = { \
> > +		.sign = 'u', \
> > +		.realbits = 10, \
> > +		.storagebits = 16, \
> > +		.endianness = IIO_CPU, \
> > +	}, \
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_chan_spec pms7003_channels[] = {
> > +	PMS7003_CHAN(0, PM1),
> > +	PMS7003_CHAN(1, PM2P5),
> > +	PMS7003_CHAN(2, PM10),
> > +	IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(3),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int pms7003_frame_okay(struct pms7003_frame *frame)
> > +{
> > +	int offset = frame->length - PMS7003_CHECKSUM_LENGTH;
> > +	u16 checksum = PMS7003_MAGIC_MSB + PMS7003_MAGIC_LSB +
> > +		       (frame->length >> 8) + (u8)frame->length +
> > +		       pms7003_calc_checksum(frame->data, offset);
> > +
> > +	return checksum == get_unaligned_be16(frame->data + offset);
> > +}
> > +
>
> The returning of 1 or 0 is not entirely obvious.  Please provide
> some documentation on what that is doing.
>
> This doesn't seem like an entirely obvious construct in general.
>
> Given we can't (I think) do anything much useful with the data until
> we get a whole frame, why not simply buffer it up unprocessed until
> we have enough data to process it in one go?
>
> On first packet dump data until you get that start markers.  After that
> wait until you have the 'header' (length) and then wait until all data
> is available keeping it in a raw buffer.
>
> A state machine that is a simple step through like this one with only
> one path ends up less readable to my eye than buffer data and
> process when all there...
>
>
> > +static int pms7003_update_frame(struct pms7003_frame *frame, u8 byte)
> > +{
> > +	switch (frame->state) {
> > +	case STATE_MAGIC_MSB:
> > +		if (byte != PMS7003_MAGIC_MSB)
> > +			return 1;
> > +		frame->state = STATE_MAGIC_LSB;
> > +		frame->length = 0;
> > +		return 1;
> > +	case STATE_MAGIC_LSB:
> > +		if (byte != PMS7003_MAGIC_LSB) {
> > +			frame->state = STATE_MAGIC_MSB;
> > +			return 1;
> > +		}
> > +		frame->state = STATE_LENGTH_MSB;
> > +		return 1;
> > +	case STATE_LENGTH_MSB:
> > +		frame->expected_length = (u16)byte << 8;
> > +		frame->state = STATE_LENGTH_LSB;
> > +		return 1;
> > +	case STATE_LENGTH_LSB:
> > +		frame->expected_length |= byte;
> > +		frame->state = STATE_DATA;
> > +		return 1;
> > +	case STATE_DATA:
> > +		if (frame->length > PMS7003_MAX_DATA_LENGTH) {
> > +			frame->state = STATE_MAGIC_MSB;
> > +			return 1;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		frame->data[frame->length++] = byte;
> > +
> > +		if (frame->length != frame->expected_length)
> > +			return 1;
> > +
> > +		if (!pms7003_frame_okay(frame)) {
> > +			frame->state = STATE_MAGIC_MSB;
> > +			return 1;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		frame->state = STATE_MAGIC_MSB;
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pms7003_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev,
> > +			       const unsigned char *buf, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev);
> > +	struct pms7003_state *state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	struct pms7003_frame *frame = &state->frame;
> > +	int i, ret;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> > +		ret = pms7003_update_frame(frame, buf[i]);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			continue;
> Given this is the normal path (continue) I would invert the
> logic to be
> 	if (!ret) {
> 		complete
> 		return..
> 	}
>
> Trivial but perhaps slightly easier to follow.
>
> > +
> > +		complete(&state->frame_ready);
> > +		return i + 1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return size;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct serdev_device_ops pms7003_serdev_ops = {
> > +	.receive_buf = pms7003_receive_buf,
> > +	.write_wakeup = serdev_device_write_wakeup,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void pms7003_stop(void *data)
> > +{
> > +	struct pms7003_state *state = data;
> > +
> > +	pms7003_do_cmd(state, CMD_SLEEP);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const unsigned long pms7003_scan_masks[] = { 0x07, 0x00 };
> > +
> > +static int pms7003_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct pms7003_state *state;
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&serdev->dev, sizeof(*state));
> > +	if (!indio_dev)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	serdev_device_set_drvdata(serdev, indio_dev);
> > +	state->serdev = serdev;
> > +	indio_dev->dev.parent = &serdev->dev;
> > +	indio_dev->info = &pms7003_info;
> > +	indio_dev->name = PMS7003_DRIVER_NAME;
> > +	indio_dev->channels = pms7003_channels,
> > +	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(pms7003_channels);
> > +	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> > +	indio_dev->available_scan_masks = pms7003_scan_masks;
> > +
> > +	mutex_init(&state->lock);
> > +	init_completion(&state->frame_ready);
> > +
> > +	serdev_device_set_client_ops(serdev, &pms7003_serdev_ops);
> > +	ret = devm_serdev_device_open(&serdev->dev, serdev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	serdev_device_set_baudrate(serdev, 9600);
> > +	serdev_device_set_flow_control(serdev, false);
> > +
> > +	ret = serdev_device_set_parity(serdev, SERDEV_PARITY_NONE);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = pms7003_do_cmd(state, CMD_WAKEUP);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(&serdev->dev, "failed to wakeup sensor\n");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = pms7003_do_cmd(state, CMD_ENTER_PASSIVE_MODE);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(&serdev->dev, "failed to enter passive mode\n");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&serdev->dev, pms7003_stop, state);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(&serdev->dev, indio_dev, NULL,
> > +					      pms7003_trigger_handler, NULL);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	return devm_iio_device_register(&serdev->dev, indio_dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id pms7003_of_match[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "plantower,pms7003" },
> > +	{ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pms7003_of_match);
> > +
> > +static struct serdev_device_driver pms7003_driver = {
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		.name = PMS7003_DRIVER_NAME,
> > +		.of_match_table = pms7003_of_match,
> > +	},
> > +	.probe = pms7003_probe,
> > +};
> > +module_serdev_device_driver(pms7003_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Plantower PMS7003 particulate matter sensor driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-23 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-06 17:16 [PATCH 0/3] add support for PMS7003 PM sensor Tomasz Duszynski
2019-01-06 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: chemical: add support for Plantower PMS7003 sensor Tomasz Duszynski
2019-01-07 15:35   ` Johan Hovold
2019-01-08 19:07     ` Tomasz Duszynski
2019-01-12 17:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-01-23 21:08     ` Tomasz Duszynski [this message]
2019-01-06 17:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: add Plantower to the vendor prefixes Tomasz Duszynski
2019-01-11 22:12   ` Rob Herring
2019-01-06 17:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: iio: chemical: pms7003: add device tree support Tomasz Duszynski
2019-01-11 22:15   ` Rob Herring
2019-01-27 13:45     ` Tomasz Duszynski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190123210828.GA18103@arch \
    --to=tduszyns@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).