linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] fscrypt: remove filesystem specific build config option
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:29:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190124182949.GB10448@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190124050337.GD8785@mit.edu>

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:03:37AM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:01:17PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > 
> > Indeed, Chandan Rajendra sent out a new version of the patch which fixes the
> > problem (by removing the 'select BLOCK' from fs/ubifs/Kconfig), but it never
> > made it into the fscrypt tree and hence never made it into linux-next.
> > 
> > Ted, what you are planning to do with the fscrypt tree following the fsverity
> > discussion?  IMO, we should keep the fsverity stuff in its own branch, separate
> > from any fscrypt changes.  As a suggestion, in the branch "fscrypt" of my
> > linux.git repo [1], I applied just these four patches on top of v5.0-rc1 and
> > resolved the conflicts with them no longer being on top of fsverity...
> 
> Sorry, I was on vacation last week and I've been catching up on things
> this week.  I've reset the master branch on my fscrypt.git tree so
> that it has what you have on your fscrypt branch, rebased to 5.0-rc3.
> 
> Also, as we had talked about earlier, it probably makes sense to set
> up jointly maintained git tree for fscrypt and fsverity.  My proposal
> is that we set up a new fscrypt.git tree, at
> /pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt.git, that would be owned by the "FSCRYPT
> group", with group membership being ebiggers, jaeguk, and tytso.
> We'll have to figure out ways that we can jointly update the git tree
> without stepping on each other, probably using a group chat.  Does
> that sound good to you?
> 

Hi Ted, that sounds good to me.  I assume you know how to get that set up?
Also, should I go ahead and send a patch that adds myself to the MAINTAINERS
file?

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-24 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-10 23:32 [PATCH] fscrypt: remove filesystem specific build config option Guenter Roeck
2019-01-11  1:01 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2019-01-24  5:03   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-01-24 18:29     ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2019-01-24 21:22       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190124182949.GB10448@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).