From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C1DC282C3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826E2218FC for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:27:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548358039; bh=9VuRLE/rYgyaSZ3x2nYSLr7TYCNRgRyAFuSPu8HOgr0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=C+Z/g6M8tyDHhXjt2HJnBed/dZIr8iomOQTsVexCEyso4u25OGhkwxO/Ocd7Y3nyC d9U0vNT66mdO/ilCdFl4gecY3vQt2Qss3eJDR2kT679643r1HyoR6zp9a/JD8FxgRW 1U9LsxDeQlEbEF5MTN2+oXYTU9CZF5cY1VauH6FQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730743AbfAXT1S (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:27:18 -0500 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:44126 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730723AbfAXT1P (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:27:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9VuRLE/rYgyaSZ3x2nYSLr7TYCNRgRyAFuSPu8HOgr0=; b=GFo3feS/VjuRVCt9AFh8lExI6 9cTuNQHOJo19Az7GdyMLJMA1RrxvwM8+rG3vYlXu6WLivW79GAvMBAi0nlX4i58ICEwTy4pA+hvfT NWSySgPLYp1rAIFzT5Zp5tdslJrHvuKnGziSGo6r2s6RK4Xe+yozPuJ+u+wFPOOiGE1CI=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=debutante.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gmkeK-0006l1-PZ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:26:52 +0000 Received: by debutante.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5B5731121B6F; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:26:52 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:26:52 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: rohkumar@qti.qualcomm.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, bgoswami@codeaurora.org, vinod.koul@linaro.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, Curtis Malainey , plai@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ajit Pandey , tiwai@suse.com, Liam Girdwood , Matthias Reichl , Rohit kumar , asishb@codeaurora.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, Curtis Malainey , Dylan Reid Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: Fix null pointer dereference in soc_find_component Message-ID: <20190124192652.GK5641@sirena.org.uk> References: <20190115211137.rhdyjadu7fppp3p4@lenny.lan> <044d59ba-094e-727d-14a9-6ebfc54cbbf4@linux.intel.com> <44029078-2749-5a3b-7b03-f38461bf268f@linux.intel.com> <20190124184412.GH5641@sirena.org.uk> <976ec85a-7b21-6c58-90cc-a3d104f9505a@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GBuTPvBEOL0MYPgd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <976ec85a-7b21-6c58-90cc-a3d104f9505a@linux.intel.com> X-Cookie: Love America -- or give it back. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --GBuTPvBEOL0MYPgd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:07:17PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, will send a formal patch with the helper and > machine driver changes after I test more with the legacy drivers. Do you > have a preference for one patch that deals with multiple machines drivers in > one shot, or individual patches? The latter are nicer for backports (e.g. > for Chrome), the former nicer for maintainers... More patches is good, it doesn't make a huge difference if I get one big patch or a series of repetitive patches - big serieses are more of an issue if they're all different patches needing individual review. --GBuTPvBEOL0MYPgd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlxKEXsACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CrfQf/TSuAQrVpDDveUkj5OeoR6tRyUeCAIhi4RM9+BZ8fprgWPxiunRRqnpAe vloJEfPPN0XMdFa1j25HnHn90yYETGwdbE/y/iGozfk6XF1g1lMxCaAfR2cVqssV nx+/im9LCh3w5nvq2GBnjaMLG87aBLv8ODnQGNDD5rGElTXKxkueajgJi4xo2VFf 25JBaw1KU8m/eLJdfDb4WGZ4o0ZEdO7p15AqSQ6Y9kvB3rlo+8UAFjHxqyIfIBMy J9URK3nojNdRlRY6T1vpqHqzvgl4+H460mCxAOviYDsnLlUSM80mmvHrFfBsXolt zWVfUkU18RAHavnsxQe1elLZSTjebw== =C+CS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GBuTPvBEOL0MYPgd--