From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697A0C282C7 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323F720880 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:57:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548763049; bh=4hZ0ycmlpMFT6CraoddwKQMRkvPOy56l0a2YYxYqJ30=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=UG2pzAvhwraItSUoTFneg9sfJ5Rr2QXOrK3ddQS8zNF9SycVJAeU48lubwrF/Hv4T ycWV2BYAqYg/NVmmKmJbeq+vH6bT+F8hyPg9Uyu0ZVr1r4j/0aCddwiGeQO/fDo6Is VGhqsQ1puG2UpzoGfHFJcx6mHarztj1P8Su+gqyk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731652AbfA2L51 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 06:57:27 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40014 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730957AbfA2LtA (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 06:49:00 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 945B42086C; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:48:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548762540; bh=4hZ0ycmlpMFT6CraoddwKQMRkvPOy56l0a2YYxYqJ30=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=E9e/gj6mJhdfb7oDI/o9hHuC0W+0RYh6/CXYtNuIlczuxAMyqpcAfoGNY9HBYzsEh iak+ylAjZxufDr8/CRsCaGK/IXAVX26TIUK5oTWPviFmJKA8GhIaXMxsSTx6UiN1W3 LvLO7A5am2Ozfr+NlYh2NLK9eVQBE241AFTBPfTk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Marek Majkowski , Willem de Bruijn , Yuchung Cheng , Neal Cardwell , Soheil Hassas Yeganeh , Alexey Kodanev , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.14 09/68] tcp: allow MSG_ZEROCOPY transmission also in CLOSE_WAIT state Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:35:31 +0100 Message-Id: <20190129113132.406064331@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190129113131.751891514@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190129113131.751891514@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Willem de Bruijn [ Upstream commit 13d7f46386e060df31b727c9975e38306fa51e7a ] TCP transmission with MSG_ZEROCOPY fails if the peer closes its end of the connection and so transitions this socket to CLOSE_WAIT state. Transmission in close wait state is acceptable. Other similar tests in the stack (e.g., in FastOpen) accept both states. Relax this test, too. Link: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg276886.html Link: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg227390.html Fixes: f214f915e7db ("tcp: enable MSG_ZEROCOPY") Reported-by: Marek Majkowski Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn CC: Yuchung Cheng CC: Neal Cardwell CC: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh CC: Alexey Kodanev Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c @@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ int tcp_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, flags = msg->msg_flags; if (flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY && size && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) { - if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) { + if ((1 << sk->sk_state) & ~(TCPF_ESTABLISHED | TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT)) { err = -EINVAL; goto out_err; }