linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, sudeep.holla@arm.com, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, nm@ti.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:48:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190130051806.fdsos27jaekkwgbs@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129091546.tfh3lo4w4sosfuba@queper01-lin>

On 29-01-19, 09:15, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Jan 2019 at 10:51:44 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 28-01-19, 11:36, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > I think this patch will result in error messages at registration on
> > > platforms that use the cpufreq-dt driver and don't specify
> > > 'dynamic-power-coefficient' for the CPUs in the DT. Not sure if that's
> > > a problem as long as the cpufreq initialization succeeds regardless,
> > > it could be seen as a not-so-gentle nudge to add the values.
> > 
> > That wouldn't be acceptable.
> 
> Fair enough. What I can propose in this case is to have in PM_OPP a
> helper called 'dev_pm_opp_of_register_em()' or something like this. This
> function will check all prerequisites are present (we have the right
> values in DT, and so on) and then call (or not) em_register_perf_domain().
> Then we can make the CPUFreq drivers use that instead of calling
> em_register_perf_domain() directly.

That should be fine.

> That would also make it easy to implement Matthias' suggestion to not
> call em_register_perf_domain() if an EM is already present.

So you will track registration state within the OPP core for that ?
Sorry but that doesn't sound right. What's wrong with having an
unregister helper in energy-model to keep proper code flow everywhere
?

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-30  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-28 16:55 [PATCH 0/7] Register an Energy Model for Arm reference platforms Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 19:02   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29  9:03     ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 17:52       ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29  5:10   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29  9:09     ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 19:36   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-01-29  5:21     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29  9:15       ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-30  5:18         ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2019-01-30  9:12           ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-30 10:17             ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-30 10:20               ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-29  5:30   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-29  9:10     ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpufreq: scpi: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-29  5:31   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: scmi: " Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: juno: Add cpu dynamic-power-coefficient information Quentin Perret
2019-01-29 15:27   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-01-30 10:23     ` Quentin Perret
2019-01-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm: dts: vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: " Quentin Perret

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190130051806.fdsos27jaekkwgbs@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).