From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com,
Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>,
perex@perex.cz, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, mkumard@nvidia.com,
rlokhande@nvidia.com, sharadg@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda/tegra: enable clock during probe
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:05:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190131110530.GA23438@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5ha7jicd4l.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4723 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:45:49 +0100,
> Jon Hunter wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 25/01/2019 11:06, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> > > If CONFIG_PM is disabled or runtime PM calls are forbidden, the clocks
> > > will not be ON. This could cause issue during probe, where hda init
> > > setup is done. This patch enables clocks unconditionally during probe.
> > >
> > > Along with above, follwoing changes are done.
> > > * enable runtime PM before exiting from probe work. This helps to avoid
> > > usage of pm_runtime_get_sync/pm_runtime_put() in probe work.
> > > * hda_tegra_disable_clocks() is moved out of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP check.
> > > * runtime PM callbacks moved out of CONFIG_PM check
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ravindra Lokhande <rlokhande@nvidia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > > sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c
> > > index c8d18dc..ba6175f 100644
> > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c
> > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_tegra.c
> > > @@ -219,7 +219,6 @@ static int hda_tegra_enable_clocks(struct hda_tegra *data)
> > > return rc;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > > static void hda_tegra_disable_clocks(struct hda_tegra *data)
> > > {
> > > clk_disable_unprepare(data->hda2hdmi_clk);
> > > @@ -227,6 +226,7 @@ static void hda_tegra_disable_clocks(struct hda_tegra *data)
> > > clk_disable_unprepare(data->hda_clk);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > > /*
> > > * power management
> > > */
> > > @@ -257,7 +257,6 @@ static int hda_tegra_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > }
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> > >
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > static int hda_tegra_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > {
> > > struct snd_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > @@ -283,7 +282,7 @@ static int hda_tegra_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > rc = hda_tegra_enable_clocks(hda);
> > > - if (rc != 0)
> > > + if (rc)
> > > return rc;
> > > if (chip && chip->running) {
> > > hda_tegra_init(hda);
> > > @@ -292,7 +291,6 @@ static int hda_tegra_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > -#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
> > >
> > > static const struct dev_pm_ops hda_tegra_pm = {
> > > SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(hda_tegra_suspend, hda_tegra_resume)
> > > @@ -551,9 +549,9 @@ static int hda_tegra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >
> > > dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, card);
> > >
> > > - pm_runtime_enable(hda->dev);
> > > - if (!azx_has_pm_runtime(chip))
> > > - pm_runtime_forbid(hda->dev);
> > > + err = hda_tegra_enable_clocks(hda);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + goto out_free;
> >
> > We also need to think about power-domains here. Enabling the clocks
> > might not be enough as the appropriate power-domain needs to be enabled.
> > For 64-bit Tegra runtime-pm will handle the power-domains (assuming they
> > are populated in device-tree). So I still think it is better we call
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() at some point rather than just replying on
> > enabling the clocks.
>
> If I understand correctly the code, the pm domain is already activated
> at calling driver's probe callback.
As far as I can tell, the domain will also be powered off again after
probe finished, unless the device grabs a runtime PM reference. This is
what happens via the dev->pm_domain->sync() call after successful probe
of a driver.
It seems to me like it's not a very well defined case what to do when a
device needs to be powered up but runtime PM is not enabled.
Adding Rafael and linux-pm, maybe they can provide some guidance on what
to do in these situations.
To summarize, what we're debating here is how to handle powering up a
device if the pm_runtime infrastructure doesn't take care of it. Jon's
proposal here was, and we use this elsewhere, to do something like this:
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
err = foo_runtime_resume(dev);
if (err < 0)
goto fail;
}
So basically when runtime PM is not available, we explicitly "resume"
the device to power it up.
It seems to me like that's a fairly common problem, so I'm wondering if
there's something that the runtime PM core could do to help with this.
Or perhaps there's already a way to achieve this that we're all
overlooking?
Rafael, any suggestions?
Thanks,
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-31 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-25 11:06 [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda/tegra: enable clock during probe Sameer Pujar
2019-01-25 11:42 ` Jon Hunter
2019-01-25 12:19 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-01-25 13:15 ` Jon Hunter
2019-01-30 12:45 ` Jon Hunter
2019-01-30 16:40 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-31 9:36 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-01-31 11:05 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2019-01-31 11:21 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-31 11:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-31 11:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-31 11:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-01-31 12:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-31 14:21 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-01-31 14:30 ` Thierry Reding
2019-01-31 23:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-04 8:16 ` Sameer Pujar
2019-02-04 8:51 ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04 10:04 ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-04 10:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-02-05 11:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-04 8:45 ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04 9:53 ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-04 11:05 ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04 12:03 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-02-04 14:00 ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04 14:28 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-02-04 16:17 ` Thierry Reding
2019-02-04 18:46 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2019-02-05 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190131110530.GA23438@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkumard@nvidia.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rlokhande@nvidia.com \
--cc=sharadg@nvidia.com \
--cc=spujar@nvidia.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).