From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E278C169C4 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFB9218AF for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:32:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548937932; bh=2cJOY3/4x2f1iwU6c1/wbHc/6tNO/YCRrnlCbF9ziXY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=wtH702qtt7NAoXynRlCwXJvVNywBsTpjukSFFgSOPDAO/SpIBrNL1PspPo/XZ3N1x tByd51vE4iq37ruzqQqxgMmKmkCGwuqiJiXdGIzFl0hzKSOuwyYiCkeHaeRo3Qn27W jwSWbMnU805pXT8k8Jj6Kbb2PjLen9Rgw7BBHU18= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732902AbfAaMcK (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 07:32:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59594 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732871AbfAaMcJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 07:32:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4A3C218FC; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:32:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548937928; bh=2cJOY3/4x2f1iwU6c1/wbHc/6tNO/YCRrnlCbF9ziXY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=K4JzAuE2+ketXbvOHD5A6Gxvd+I5EUUOX9Ce/kwzrYGPQWr7CFRw0YCYlbbOuFs0O oXDrQWbbfYJsiGQuFeLN6xX3AOGO4ZKnZmChhqfDSq6T2qKBA613RbhO7ltubYiA5o awhldaVE7OCQZPFYen3orqSlqru56OtRX3twaOho= Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:32:05 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Ayush Mittal Cc: tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pankaj.m@samsung.com, a.sahrawat@samsung.com, v.narang@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernfs: Allocating memory for kernfs_iattrs with kmem_cache. Message-ID: <20190131123205.GA20404@kroah.com> References: <1548927785-40397-1-git-send-email-ayush.m@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1548927785-40397-1-git-send-email-ayush.m@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:13:05PM +0530, Ayush Mittal wrote: > @@ -414,4 +414,9 @@ void __init kernfs_init(void) > 0, > SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, > NULL); > + kernfs_iattrs_cache = kmem_cache_create("kernfs_iattrs_cache", > + sizeof(struct kernfs_iattrs), > + 0, > + SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, > + NULL); > } Are you sure the comment above this holds true for this new cache as well? Please document it as well as the other one was, and remove the SLAB_ flags as needed. thanks, greg k-h