From: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"marc.zyngier@arm.com" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"bigeasy@linutronix.de" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Make vgic_irq->irq_lock a raw_spinlock
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:36:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190201173650.GC29111@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa628aae-68eb-7140-0533-367cafa26ed6@arm.com>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 03:30:58PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On 07/01/2019 15:06, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > vgic_irq->irq_lock must always be taken with interrupts disabled as
> > it is used in interrupt context.
>
> I am a bit confused with the reason here. The code mention that ap_list_lock
> could be taken from the timer interrupt handler interrupt. I assume it
> speaks about the handler kvm_arch_timer_handler. Looking at the
> configuration of the interrupt, the flag IRQF_NO_THREAD is not set, so the
> interrupt should be threaded when CONFIG_PREEMPT_FULL is set. If my
> understanding is correct, this means the interrupt thread would sleep if it
> takes the spinlock.
>
> Did I miss anything? Do you have an exact path where the vGIC is actually
> called from an interrupt context?
The part you're missing is that percpu interrupts are not force
threaded:
static int irq_setup_forced_threading(struct irqaction *new)
{
if (!force_irqthreads)
return 0;
if (new->flags & (IRQF_NO_THREAD | IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_ONESHOT))
return 0;
/* ...*/
}
Julia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-01 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-07 15:06 [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Use raw_spinlock for locks taken in IRQ context Julien Thierry
2019-01-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Make vgic_irq->irq_lock a raw_spinlock Julien Thierry
2019-02-01 15:30 ` Julien Grall
2019-02-01 17:36 ` Julia Cartwright [this message]
2019-02-01 17:55 ` Julien Grall
2019-01-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Make vgic_dist->lpi_list_lock " Julien Thierry
2019-01-07 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Make vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock " Julien Thierry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190201173650.GC29111@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com \
--to=julia@ni.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).