From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] arm64: implement ftrace with regs
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 13:51:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190207125159.GA19818@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <198550d8-78d4-6e30-0179-b5e07dd140f8@arm.com>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:33:50AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2019 15:05, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 08:59:44AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
> >> Hi Torsten,
> >>
> >> On 18/01/2019 16:39, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> >>> @@ -133,17 +163,45 @@ int ftrace_make_call(struct dyn_ftrace *
> >>> return ftrace_modify_code(pc, old, new, true);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> >>> +int ftrace_modify_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long old_addr,
> >>> + unsigned long addr)
> >>> +{
> >>> + unsigned long pc = rec->ip + REC_IP_BRANCH_OFFSET;
> >>> + u32 old, new;
> >>> +
> >>> + old = aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm(pc, old_addr, true);
> >>> + new = aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm(pc, addr, true);
> >>> +
> >>> + return ftrace_modify_code(pc, old, new, true);
> >>> +}
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +
> >>> /*
> >>> * Turn off the call to ftrace_caller() in instrumented function
> >>> */
> >>> int ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec,
> >>> unsigned long addr)
> >>> {
> >>> - unsigned long pc = rec->ip;
> >>> + unsigned long pc = rec->ip + REC_IP_BRANCH_OFFSET;
> >>
> >> Sorry to come back on this patch again, but I was looking at the ftrace
> >> code a bit, and I see that when processing the ftrace call locations,
> >> ftrace calls ftrace_call_adjust() on every ip registered as mcount
> >> caller (or in our case patchable entries). This ftrace_call_adjust() is
> >> arch specific, so I was thinking we could place the offset in here once
> >> and for all so we don't have to worry about it in the future.
> >
> > Now that you mention it - yes indeed that's the correct facility to fix
> > the deviating address, as Steve has also confirmed. I had totally forgotten
> > about this hook.
> >
> >> Also, I'm unsure whether it would be safe, but we could patch the "mov
> >> x9, lr" there as well. In theory, this would be called at init time
> >> (before secondary CPUs are brought up) and when loading a module (so I'd
> >> expect no-one is executing that code *yet*.
> >>
> >> If this is possible, I think it would make things a bit cleaner.
> >
> > This is in fact very tempting, but it will introduce a nasty side effect
> > to ftrace_call_adjust. Is there any obvious documentation that specifies
> > guarantees about ftrace_call_adjust being called exactly once for each site?
> >
>
> I don't see really much documentation on that function. As far as I can
> tell it is only called once for each site (and if it didn't, we'd always
> be placing the same instruction, but I agree it wouldn't be nice). It
> could depend on how far you can expand the notion of "adjusting" :) .
I've been thinking this over and I'm considering to make an ftrace_modify_code
with verify and warn_once if it fails. Then read the insn back and bug_on
should it not be the lr saver. Any objections?
> Steven, do you have an opinion on whether it would be acceptable to
> modify function entry code in ftrace_call_adjust() ?
Yes, Steve's vote first.
Torsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-07 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-18 16:37 [PATCH v7 0/3] arm64: ftrace with regs Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] arm64: replace -pg with CC_FLAGS_FTRACE in Makefiles Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 17:24 ` Mark Rutland
2019-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] arm64: implement ftrace with regs Torsten Duwe
2019-01-22 1:39 ` Singh, Balbir
2019-01-22 13:09 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-23 20:38 ` Singh, Balbir
2019-01-22 10:18 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-22 13:28 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-22 13:49 ` Julien Thierry
2019-01-22 13:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-04 12:03 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-04 13:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-06 8:59 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-06 9:30 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-06 14:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-06 15:05 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-02-07 10:33 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-07 12:51 ` Torsten Duwe [this message]
2019-02-07 13:47 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-07 14:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-02-07 14:58 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-07 15:00 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-04-03 2:48 ` Mark Rutland
2019-04-03 12:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-03 13:05 ` Torsten Duwe
2019-01-18 16:39 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] arm64: use -fpatchable-function-entry if available Torsten Duwe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190207125159.GA19818@lst.de \
--to=duwe@lst.de \
--cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).