On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 10:50:28PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:52 PM Jonathan Neuschäfer
[...]
> > I tried to compare the CCM's clocks between i.MX50 and i.MX53, but
> > unfortunately, the i.MX50 reference manual doesn't have the table called
> > "Output clocks from CCM".
> 
> Please check Table 5-10. CCM_CCGR3 Gated Clock Mapping to Target
> Module from the MX50 Referene Manual.

Ok, the tables show:

For i.MX50:
[1:0] 0 ipg_clk_root    eSDHCv2_1
[3:2] 1 esdhc1_clk_root eSDHCv2_1

For i.MX53:
1–0 CG0 esdhc1_ipg_hclk: affects ipg_clk and hclk inputs of ESDEHC-1 (esdhc1_clk_enable)
3–2 CG1 esdhc1_perclk:   affects ipg_clk_perclk   input  of ESDEHC-1 (esdhc1_serial_clk_enable)

Table 18-3 (Output clocks from CCM) in the iMX53RM shows that
ESDHCv2-1's ipg_clk_perclk is esdhc1_clk_root, so the clock structure
does seem to be the same here, between i.MX50 and i.MX53…

(The reason why I looked at i.MX53 is that there are several i.MX53
boards in tree, so it appears to be well tested under mainline Linux)


> Does the change below help?
> 
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx50.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx50.dtsi
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
>                                         reg = <0x50004000 0x4000>;
>                                         interrupts = <1>;
>                                         clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_ESDHC1_IPG_GATE>,
> -                                                <&clks IMX5_CLK_DUMMY>,
> +                                                <&clks IMX5_CLK_ESDHC1_IPG_GATE>,
>                                                  <&clks IMX5_CLK_ESDHC1_PER_GATE>;
>                                         clock-names = "ipg", "ahb", "per";

Unfortunately, this doesn't help.


Thanks,
Jonathan Neuschäfer