From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002F9C169C4 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C6C222A2 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:33:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549895629; bh=gEhwqgC+G2CNUoKzKepKpe3E8avKGv4LOBXQuzWLMLs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=LusMQkoBpBys0ZMzPTJfn1FvSbY0KOIv/EU3UyEYJrjoaSUNL140jbUDOAfi8KZGm /SOPbplR76DJZQnwV4unG1nb4vIqq0awdVbU7++NPDUNxpX1Wz1+S23fwYCd4BqdNy cuGwo8l1fd+zf2iApMxMXyqFSfuWdzcoNjj7YiMM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730719AbfBKOdr (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:33:47 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41556 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730689AbfBKOdm (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:33:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F29C21855; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:33:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549895621; bh=gEhwqgC+G2CNUoKzKepKpe3E8avKGv4LOBXQuzWLMLs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ao18J2MV9G3mCpO0K3HRmxl709GQQUmq9GIdQ0fjr6xAAQhZ7VM/qvPEN+uCKcRbX JtjFuY73fw0/t+93WQEDSYk/DQYfRGPGvChlLxDVA2vYYmOHOhNNFUoKBNrZXNm5cH SQfCEnQxPAJcmPLvnIR5DHUzblSEzuLnPwsduUws= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Junxiao Bi , Changwei Ge , Yiwen Jiang , Joel Becker , Joseph Qi , Jun Piao , Mark Fasheh , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.20 266/352] ocfs2: dont clear bh uptodate for block read Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:18:13 +0100 Message-Id: <20190211141903.943022204@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190211141846.543045703@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190211141846.543045703@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit 70306d9dce75abde855cefaf32b3f71eed8602a3 ] For sync io read in ocfs2_read_blocks_sync(), first clear bh uptodate flag and submit the io, second wait io done, last check whether bh uptodate, if not return io error. If two sync io for the same bh were issued, it could be the first io done and set uptodate flag, but just before check that flag, the second io came in and cleared uptodate, then ocfs2_read_blocks_sync() for the first io will return IO error. Indeed it's not necessary to clear uptodate flag, as the io end handler end_buffer_read_sync() will set or clear it based on io succeed or failed. The following message was found from a nfs server but the underlying storage returned no error. [4106438.567376] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_get_suballoc_slot_bit:2780 ERROR: read block 1238823695 failed -5 [4106438.567569] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_get_suballoc_slot_bit:2812 ERROR: status = -5 [4106438.567611] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_test_inode_bit:2894 ERROR: get alloc slot and bit failed -5 [4106438.567643] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_test_inode_bit:2932 ERROR: status = -5 [4106438.567675] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_get_dentry:94 ERROR: test inode bit failed -5 Same issue in non sync read ocfs2_read_blocks(), fixed it as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181121020023.3034-4-junxiao.bi@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi Reviewed-by: Changwei Ge Reviewed-by: Yiwen Jiang Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Joseph Qi Cc: Jun Piao Cc: Mark Fasheh Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c index 4ebbd57cbf84..f9b84f7a3e4b 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c @@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks_sync(struct ocfs2_super *osb, u64 block, #endif } - clear_buffer_uptodate(bh); get_bh(bh); /* for end_buffer_read_sync() */ bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync; submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, 0, bh); @@ -341,7 +340,6 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci, u64 block, int nr, continue; } - clear_buffer_uptodate(bh); get_bh(bh); /* for end_buffer_read_sync() */ if (validate) set_buffer_needs_validate(bh); -- 2.19.1