From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884E1C282C4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5481A217D9 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:14:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549991677; bh=B+4Xs3900ZIfxAVOsoVcpsuM4zZ1FmkyNj31TryJhxs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=SXjViu443T56DB51wvOfglMR2G5JJmRFGC2hqL0CXmLjCfbgPVJs/mGCbbRCeT3jW +xiWNpHTW6ml2dvGbpYq9FAFKtSNCzhZReRCrGwQFIhhA14tsEP/y+ElpG+61mop/i QBCNhBVunykbUxHBIf2Zcv/9OsnGqxg5gh96/5Kc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731358AbfBLROf (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:14:35 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56892 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728686AbfBLROe (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:14:34 -0500 Received: from lerouge.home (lfbn-1-18527-45.w90-101.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.101.69.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1FFB20855; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:14:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549991673; bh=B+4Xs3900ZIfxAVOsoVcpsuM4zZ1FmkyNj31TryJhxs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lOWniW6WPpwoZS/IKxzay0zkjFWpdK+jHSYE+u2Tg4PlcYtjdQuS/RtOkBSQ2kPvP 63QHUkH5zxXpgYmN8rTn23LActkYLYhoxbk/58BZMe7HRBL0C1YqsHooF7nH89d35d nYXULQKAreYL+Csqh2QvCWRH+/rJmU+zXTe8cwk8= From: Frederic Weisbecker To: LKML Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Peter Zijlstra , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linus Torvalds , "David S . Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E . McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Pavan Kondeti , Ingo Molnar , Joel Fernandes Subject: [PATCH 01/32] locking/lockdep: Use expanded masks on find_usage_*() functions Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:13:52 +0100 Message-Id: <20190212171423.8308-2-frederic@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190212171423.8308-1-frederic@kernel.org> References: <20190212171423.8308-1-frederic@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In order to perform softirq vector-finegrained locking validation we'll need to be able to check multiple vector usages at once. Prepare the low level usage mask check functions for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Joel Fernandes Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Pavan Kondeti Cc: Paul E . McKenney Cc: David S . Miller Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 608f74ed8bb9..6127cef4f8fb 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -1335,9 +1335,9 @@ check_redundant(struct lock_list *root, struct lock_class *target, * without creating any illegal irq-safe -> irq-unsafe lock dependency. */ -static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit) +static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask) { - return entry->class->usage_mask & (1 << (enum lock_usage_bit)bit); + return entry->class->usage_mask & *(u64 *)mask; } @@ -1353,14 +1353,14 @@ static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit) * Return <0 on error. */ static int -find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit, +find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, u64 usage_mask, struct lock_list **target_entry) { int result; debug_atomic_inc(nr_find_usage_forwards_checks); - result = __bfs_forwards(root, (void *)bit, usage_match, target_entry); + result = __bfs_forwards(root, &usage_mask, usage_match, target_entry); return result; } @@ -1376,14 +1376,14 @@ find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit, * Return <0 on error. */ static int -find_usage_backwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit, +find_usage_backwards(struct lock_list *root, u64 usage_mask, struct lock_list **target_entry) { int result; debug_atomic_inc(nr_find_usage_backwards_checks); - result = __bfs_backwards(root, (void *)bit, usage_match, target_entry); + result = __bfs_backwards(root, &usage_mask, usage_match, target_entry); return result; } @@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, this.parent = NULL; this.class = hlock_class(prev); - ret = find_usage_backwards(&this, bit_backwards, &target_entry); + ret = find_usage_backwards(&this, BIT(bit_backwards), &target_entry); if (ret < 0) return print_bfs_bug(ret); if (ret == 1) @@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, that.parent = NULL; that.class = hlock_class(next); - ret = find_usage_forwards(&that, bit_forwards, &target_entry1); + ret = find_usage_forwards(&that, BIT(bit_forwards), &target_entry1); if (ret < 0) return print_bfs_bug(ret); if (ret == 1) @@ -2553,7 +2553,7 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, */ static int check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, - enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *irqclass) + u64 usage_mask, const char *irqclass) { int ret; struct lock_list root; @@ -2561,7 +2561,7 @@ check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, root.parent = NULL; root.class = hlock_class(this); - ret = find_usage_forwards(&root, bit, &target_entry); + ret = find_usage_forwards(&root, usage_mask, &target_entry); if (ret < 0) return print_bfs_bug(ret); if (ret == 1) @@ -2577,7 +2577,7 @@ check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, */ static int check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, - enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *irqclass) + u64 usage_mask, const char *irqclass) { int ret; struct lock_list root; @@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, root.parent = NULL; root.class = hlock_class(this); - ret = find_usage_backwards(&root, bit, &target_entry); + ret = find_usage_backwards(&root, usage_mask, &target_entry); if (ret < 0) return print_bfs_bug(ret); if (ret == 1) @@ -2644,7 +2644,7 @@ static inline int state_verbose(enum lock_usage_bit bit, } typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *, - enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name); + u64 usage_mask, const char *name); static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, @@ -2676,7 +2676,7 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, * states. */ if ((!read || !dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS) && - !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & ~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) + !usage(curr, this, BIT(excl_bit), state_name(new_bit & ~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) return 0; /* @@ -2687,7 +2687,7 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, return 0; if (STRICT_READ_CHECKS && - !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK, + !usage(curr, this, BIT(excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK), state_name(new_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) return 0; } -- 2.17.1