From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
andrew.murray@arm.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: io: Hook up __io_par() for inX() ordering
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:25:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190213172528.GI6346@brain-police> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWFOvrZ5JwgWnx9ujg3dS-75PnjGRqn-vzGmFi295Sb=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:42:44AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:34 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > Ensure that inX() provides the same ordering guarantees as readX()
> > by hooking up __io_par() so that it maps directly to __iormb().
> >
> > Reported-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
> > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static inline u64 __raw_readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
> > : "memory"); \
> > })
> >
> > +#define __io_par __iormb
>
> I think it makes sense to make the parameter passing explicit, for
> documentation purposes:
>
> #define __io_par(v) __iormb(v)
Thanks, I'll make that change for v2.
Will
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-13 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 17:45 [PATCH 0/2] Ensure inX() is ordered wrt delay() routines Will Deacon
2019-02-11 17:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/io: Pass result on inX() accessor to __io_par() Will Deacon
2019-02-12 11:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-13 17:46 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-13 20:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-02-13 21:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-02-18 15:56 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 17:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: io: Hook up __io_par() for inX() ordering Will Deacon
2019-02-12 10:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-13 17:25 ` Will Deacon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190213172528.GI6346@brain-police \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).