From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=Aihr=QY=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07118C43381
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 23:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82BD206C0
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 23:15:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727218AbfBQXPI (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:15:08 -0500
Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:38146 "EHLO ms.lwn.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726283AbfBQXPI (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:15:08 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 690392DC;
        Sun, 17 Feb 2019 23:14:52 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Sun, 17 Feb 2019 16:14:28 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
        "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
        "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] admin-guide: extend perf-security with resource
 control, data categories and privileged users
Message-ID: <20190217161428.6b43608a@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <784bbe0d-56c1-bd63-1879-b7db988e40c0@linux.intel.com>
References: <784bbe0d-56c1-bd63-1879-b7db988e40c0@linux.intel.com>
Organization: LWN.net
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:32:33 +0300
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> The patch set extends the first version of perf-security.rst documentation
> file [1], [2], [3] with the following topics:
> 
> 1) perf_events/Perf resource limits and control management that describes
>    RLIMIT_NOFILE and perf_event_mlock_kb settings for processes conducting
>    performance monitoring;
> 
> 2) categories of system and performance data that can be captured by
>    perf_events/Perf with explicit designation of process sensitive data;
> 
> 3) possible steps to create perf_event/Perf privileged users groups for 
>    the current implementations of perf_events syscall API [4] and Perf tool;

I've applied the set, thanks.

jon