From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B39C43381 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C82E2147A for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728897AbfBSQGK (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:06:10 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:33934 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726352AbfBSQGK (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:06:10 -0500 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gw7uI-0000zY-Ur; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:06:07 +0100 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:06:06 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Juri Lelli Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] softirq: Avoid "local_softirq_pending" messages if ksoftirqd is blocked Message-ID: <20190219160606.jwjrgf6nxarnd2wt@linutronix.de> References: <20190218163107.iwdpngwmbs6xyk7x@linutronix.de> <20190219145826.GH21785@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190219145826.GH21785@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-02-19 15:58:26 [+0100], Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I've been seeing those messages while running some stress tests (hog > tasks pinned to CPUs). > > Have yet to see them after I applied this patch earlier this morning (it > usually took not much time to reproduce). So is it better or not. I kind of read this as "nothing changed". > Tested-by: Juri Lelli > > Thanks! > > - Juri Sebastian