From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] igb_main: mark expected switch fall-through
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:22:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190219202250.GA32418@embeddedor> (raw)
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c: In function ‘__igb_notify_dca’:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6694:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (dca_add_requester(dev) == 0) {
^
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6701:2: note: here
case DCA_PROVIDER_REMOVE:
^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index 69b230c53fed..483f0977f70e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -6697,7 +6697,7 @@ static int __igb_notify_dca(struct device *dev, void *data)
igb_setup_dca(adapter);
break;
}
- /* Fall Through since DCA is disabled. */
+ /* Fall Through - since DCA is disabled. */
case DCA_PROVIDER_REMOVE:
if (adapter->flags & IGB_FLAG_DCA_ENABLED) {
/* without this a class_device is left
--
2.20.1
reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190219202250.GA32418@embeddedor \
--to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).