linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guroan@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] freezer for cgroup v2
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:37:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190220143748.GA9477@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190219220252.4906-1-guro@fb.com>

On 02/19, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> It provides similar functionality as v1 freezer, but the interface
> conforms to the cgroup v2 interface design principles, and it
> provides a better user experience: tasks can be killed, ptrace works,

I tried to not argue with intent, but to be honest I am more and more
sceptical... Lets forget about ptrace for the moment.

Once again, why do we want a killable freezer?

If a user wants to kill a frozen task from CGRP_FROZEN cgroup he can simply

	1. send SIGKILL to that task

	2. migrate it to the root cgroup.

why this doesn't / can't work?



Why I am starting to argue... The ability to kill a frozen task complicates
the code, and since cgroup_enter_stopped() (in this version at least) doesn't
properly interacts with freezable_schedule() leads to other problems.

From 7/7:

	+  cgroup.freeze
	+	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
	+	Allowed values are "0" and "1". The default is "0".
	+
	+	Writing "1" to the file causes freezing of the cgroup and all
	+	descendant cgroups. This means that all belonging processes will
	+	be stopped and will not run until the cgroup will be explicitly
	+	unfrozen. Freezing of the cgroup may take some time;
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
it may take infinite time.

Just suppose that a task does vfork() and this races with cgroup_do_freeze(true).
If the new child notices JOBCTL_TRAP_FREEZE before exit/exec the cgroup will be
never frozen.

If I read the current kernel/cgroup/freezer.c correctly, CGROUP_FREEZING should
"always" work (unless a task hangs in D state) and to me this looks more important
than kill/ptrace support...

> there is no separate controller, which has to be enabled, etc.

agreed, this is nice.

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-20 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-19 22:02 [PATCH v8 0/7] freezer for cgroup v2 Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] cgroup: rename freezer.c into legacy_freezer.c Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] cgroup: implement __cgroup_task_count() helper Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] cgroup: protect cgroup->nr_(dying_)descendants by css_set_lock Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] cgroup: cgroup v2 freezer Roman Gushchin
2019-02-20 14:42   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-02-20 22:14     ` Roman Gushchin
2019-02-21 16:44       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] kselftests: cgroup: don't fail on cg_kill_all() error in cg_destroy() Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] kselftests: cgroup: add freezer controller self-tests Roman Gushchin
2019-02-19 22:02 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] cgroup: document cgroup v2 freezer interface Roman Gushchin
2019-02-20 14:37 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2019-02-20 22:00   ` [PATCH v8 0/7] freezer for cgroup v2 Roman Gushchin
2019-02-21 16:29     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-02-21 17:34       ` Tejun Heo
2019-02-22 16:34         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-02-22 18:17           ` Tejun Heo
2019-02-25 15:57             ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-05 17:27               ` Tejun Heo
2019-02-21 22:43       ` Roman Gushchin
2019-02-22 17:04         ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190220143748.GA9477@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=guroan@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).