From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96A7C43381 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA8920818 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="VqV6yA2/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728622AbfBUScQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:32:16 -0500 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:38888 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725831AbfBUScQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:32:16 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1LINkpN001627; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:32:10 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=atIVD4ILPuOHjcsne/XUsEwwvQDrCLJVV6FplUCwJo4=; b=VqV6yA2/spU2GPz22Z5YycCOgtpTerEsqdlTGs9kaFxUigH4BS9+jdFkXL3CJMUV/K6P WXHlLPTzOERuZr4LocTl22kxnnbV6bEDc2nnbX99DOpy12oV83tD0nR/b97x7JvxEPd5 6FN41Y8IayeaHMqx+uubjpgGrRGdikYVjU/Fy7XEJCnUpccOsw7LAnAoLrwbx26wbaqJ OGe87jESMB5i0YET7poyvx+WthdRVcOojsRe2RJA3vQtpsVAj5gn3TPm9SZ5oPTlrYd9 2Z9iBVTvs30Fb9skhgpz/Mfd7MpjQsRZ9KpZ5gGIZRc9DBP/WcKdWlDBtfHxLcI89bMa cg== Received: from aserv0021.oracle.com (aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2qp9xu9xdp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:32:10 +0000 Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1LIW4cM016426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:32:04 GMT Received: from abhmp0017.oracle.com (abhmp0017.oracle.com [141.146.116.23]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x1LIW3bX028380; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:32:03 GMT Received: from kadam (/197.157.0.34) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:32:02 -0800 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 21:31:54 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Nick Crews Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra , Benson Leung , linux-kernel , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Duncan Laurie Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] platform/chrome: Fix off-by-one error in wilco_ec/debugfs.c Message-ID: <20190221070704.GD1711@kadam> References: <20190220215826.44366-1-ncrews@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9174 signatures=668684 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902210129 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:15:18PM -0700, Nick Crews wrote: > Fixing something after it's already in the tree was a new > process for me, so I tried to copy other people's examples. Please > let me know if there's anything else I should do something different > next time. I seldom mention how much I like Reported-by tags because it makes me seem needy... Also in this case it doesn't matter because it's going to get folded into the original patch so it's going to be lost anyway. But since you're asking process questions, the Reported-by cookie is nice. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter regards, dan carpenter