linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, retpolines: raise limit for generating indirect calls from switch-case
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:19:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190221221941.29358-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)

From networking side, there are numerous attempts to get rid of
indirect calls in fast-path wherever feasible in order to avoid
the cost of retpolines, for example, just to name a few:

  * 283c16a2dfd3 ("indirect call wrappers: helpers to speed-up indirect calls of builtin")
  * aaa5d90b395a ("net: use indirect call wrappers at GRO network layer")
  * 028e0a476684 ("net: use indirect call wrappers at GRO transport layer")
  * 356da6d0cde3 ("dma-mapping: bypass indirect calls for dma-direct")
  * 09772d92cd5a ("bpf: avoid retpoline for lookup/update/delete calls on maps")
  * 10870dd89e95 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add direct calls for all builtin expressions")
  [...]

Recent work on XDP from Björn and Magnus additionally found that
manually transforming the XDP return code switch statement with
more than 5 cases into if-else combination would result in a
considerable speedup in XDP layer due to avoidance of indirect
calls in CONFIG_RETPOLINE enabled builds. On i40e driver with
XDP prog attached, a 20-26% speedup has been observed [0]. Aside
from XDP, there are many other places later in the networking
stack's critical path with similar switch-case processing. Rather
than fixing every XDP-enabled driver and locations in stack by
hand, it would be good to instead raise the limit where gcc would
emit expensive indirect calls from the switch under retpolines
and stick with the default as-is in case of !retpoline configured
kernels. This would also have the advantage that for archs where
this is not necessary, we let compiler select the underlying
target optimization for these constructs and avoid potential
slow-downs by if-else hand-rewrite.

In case of gcc, this setting is controlled by case-values-threshold
which has an architecture global default that selects 4 or 5 (latter
if target does not have a case insn that compares the bounds) where
some arch back ends like arm64 or s390 override it with their own
target hooks, for example, in gcc commit db7a90aa0de5 ("S/390:
Disable prediction of indirect branches") the threshold pretty
much disables jump tables by limit of 20 under retpoline builds.
Comparing gcc's and clang's default code generation on x86-64 under
O2 level with retpoline build results in the following outcome
for 5 switch cases:

* gcc with -mindirect-branch=thunk-inline -mindirect-branch-register:

  # gdb -batch -ex 'disassemble dispatch' ./c-switch
  Dump of assembler code for function dispatch:
   0x0000000000400be0 <+0>:     cmp    $0x4,%edi
   0x0000000000400be3 <+3>:     ja     0x400c35 <dispatch+85>
   0x0000000000400be5 <+5>:     lea    0x915f8(%rip),%rdx        # 0x4921e4
   0x0000000000400bec <+12>:    mov    %edi,%edi
   0x0000000000400bee <+14>:    movslq (%rdx,%rdi,4),%rax
   0x0000000000400bf2 <+18>:    add    %rdx,%rax
   0x0000000000400bf5 <+21>:    callq  0x400c01 <dispatch+33>
   0x0000000000400bfa <+26>:    pause
   0x0000000000400bfc <+28>:    lfence
   0x0000000000400bff <+31>:    jmp    0x400bfa <dispatch+26>
   0x0000000000400c01 <+33>:    mov    %rax,(%rsp)
   0x0000000000400c05 <+37>:    retq
   0x0000000000400c06 <+38>:    nopw   %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
   0x0000000000400c10 <+48>:    jmpq   0x400c90 <fn_3>
   0x0000000000400c15 <+53>:    nopl   (%rax)
   0x0000000000400c18 <+56>:    jmpq   0x400c70 <fn_2>
   0x0000000000400c1d <+61>:    nopl   (%rax)
   0x0000000000400c20 <+64>:    jmpq   0x400c50 <fn_1>
   0x0000000000400c25 <+69>:    nopl   (%rax)
   0x0000000000400c28 <+72>:    jmpq   0x400c40 <fn_0>
   0x0000000000400c2d <+77>:    nopl   (%rax)
   0x0000000000400c30 <+80>:    jmpq   0x400cb0 <fn_4>
   0x0000000000400c35 <+85>:    push   %rax
   0x0000000000400c36 <+86>:    callq  0x40dd80 <abort>
  End of assembler dump.

* clang with -mretpoline emitting search tree:

  # gdb -batch -ex 'disassemble dispatch' ./c-switch
  Dump of assembler code for function dispatch:
   0x0000000000400b30 <+0>:     cmp    $0x1,%edi
   0x0000000000400b33 <+3>:     jle    0x400b44 <dispatch+20>
   0x0000000000400b35 <+5>:     cmp    $0x2,%edi
   0x0000000000400b38 <+8>:     je     0x400b4d <dispatch+29>
   0x0000000000400b3a <+10>:    cmp    $0x3,%edi
   0x0000000000400b3d <+13>:    jne    0x400b52 <dispatch+34>
   0x0000000000400b3f <+15>:    jmpq   0x400c50 <fn_3>
   0x0000000000400b44 <+20>:    test   %edi,%edi
   0x0000000000400b46 <+22>:    jne    0x400b5c <dispatch+44>
   0x0000000000400b48 <+24>:    jmpq   0x400c20 <fn_0>
   0x0000000000400b4d <+29>:    jmpq   0x400c40 <fn_2>
   0x0000000000400b52 <+34>:    cmp    $0x4,%edi
   0x0000000000400b55 <+37>:    jne    0x400b66 <dispatch+54>
   0x0000000000400b57 <+39>:    jmpq   0x400c60 <fn_4>
   0x0000000000400b5c <+44>:    cmp    $0x1,%edi
   0x0000000000400b5f <+47>:    jne    0x400b66 <dispatch+54>
   0x0000000000400b61 <+49>:    jmpq   0x400c30 <fn_1>
   0x0000000000400b66 <+54>:    push   %rax
   0x0000000000400b67 <+55>:    callq  0x40dd20 <abort>
  End of assembler dump.

  For sake of comparison, clang without -mretpoline:

  # gdb -batch -ex 'disassemble dispatch' ./c-switch
  Dump of assembler code for function dispatch:
   0x0000000000400b30 <+0>:	cmp    $0x4,%edi
   0x0000000000400b33 <+3>:	ja     0x400b57 <dispatch+39>
   0x0000000000400b35 <+5>:	mov    %edi,%eax
   0x0000000000400b37 <+7>:	jmpq   *0x492148(,%rax,8)
   0x0000000000400b3e <+14>:	jmpq   0x400bf0 <fn_0>
   0x0000000000400b43 <+19>:	jmpq   0x400c30 <fn_4>
   0x0000000000400b48 <+24>:	jmpq   0x400c10 <fn_2>
   0x0000000000400b4d <+29>:	jmpq   0x400c20 <fn_3>
   0x0000000000400b52 <+34>:	jmpq   0x400c00 <fn_1>
   0x0000000000400b57 <+39>:	push   %rax
   0x0000000000400b58 <+40>:	callq  0x40dcf0 <abort>
  End of assembler dump.

Raising the cases to a high number (e.g. 100) will still result
in similar code generation pattern with clang and gcc as above,
in other words clang generally turns off jump table emission by
having an extra expansion pass under retpoline build to turn
indirectbr instructions from their IR into switch instructions
as a built-in -mno-jump-table lowering of a switch (in this
case, even if IR input already contained an indirect branch).

For gcc, adding --param=case-values-threshold=20 as in similar
fashion as s390 in order to raise the limit for x86 retpoline
enabled builds results in a small vmlinux size increase of only
0.13% (before=18,027,528 after=18,051,192). For clang this
option is ignored due to i) not being needed as mentioned and
ii) not having above cmdline parameter. Non-retpoline-enabled
builds with gcc continue to use the default case-values-threshold
setting, so nothing changes here.

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190129095754.9390-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com/
      and "The Path to DPDK Speeds for AF_XDP", LPC 2018, networking track:
       - http://vger.kernel.org/lpc_net2018_talks/lpc18_pres_af_xdp_perf-v3.pdf
       - http://vger.kernel.org/lpc_net2018_talks/lpc18_paper_af_xdp_perf-v2.pdf

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/Makefile | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index 9c5a67d1b9c1..f55420a67164 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -217,6 +217,11 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
 # Avoid indirect branches in kernel to deal with Spectre
 ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
   KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS)
+  # Additionally, avoid generating expensive indirect jumps which
+  # are subject to retpolines for small number of switch cases.
+  # clang turns off jump table generation by default when under
+  # retpoline builds, however, gcc does not for x86.
+  KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,--param=case-values-threshold=20)
 endif
 
 archscripts: scripts_basic
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2019-02-21 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-21 22:19 Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2019-02-21 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-21 22:56   ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-02-22  7:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-02-26 18:20   ` Björn Töpel
2019-02-28 11:12 ` [tip:x86/build] x86, retpolines: Raise " tip-bot for Daniel Borkmann
2019-02-28 11:27   ` David Woodhouse
2019-02-28 12:53     ` H.J. Lu
2019-02-28 16:18       ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-02-28 16:25         ` H.J. Lu
2019-02-28 17:58           ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-02-28 18:09             ` H.J. Lu
2019-02-28 18:13               ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190221221941.29358-1-daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] x86, retpolines: raise limit for generating indirect calls from switch-case' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).