From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 26/26] userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:52:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226075234.GN13653@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226065836.GD5873@rapoport-lnx>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:58:36AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:56:32AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > This patch adds uffd tests for write protection.
> >
> > Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp
> > tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are:
> >
> > (1) Bouncing tests
> >
> > We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test:
> >
> > - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then
> > we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be
> > at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP.
> >
> > - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories:
> > To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of
> > uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the
> > background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each
> > page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect
> > the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least
> > half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first
> > half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue
> > with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting
> > tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half.
> >
> > (2) Event/Signal test
> >
> > Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For
> > sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the
> > write protection faults.
> >
> > For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 154 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> > index e5d12c209e09..57b5ac02080a 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> > #include <linux/userfaultfd.h>
> > #include <setjmp.h>
> > #include <stdbool.h>
> > +#include <assert.h>
> >
> > #include "../kselftest.h"
> >
> > @@ -78,6 +79,8 @@ static int test_type;
> > #define ALARM_INTERVAL_SECS 10
> > static volatile bool test_uffdio_copy_eexist = true;
> > static volatile bool test_uffdio_zeropage_eexist = true;
> > +/* Whether to test uffd write-protection */
> > +static bool test_uffdio_wp = false;
> >
> > static bool map_shared;
> > static int huge_fd;
> > @@ -92,6 +95,7 @@ pthread_attr_t attr;
> > struct uffd_stats {
> > int cpu;
> > unsigned long missing_faults;
> > + unsigned long wp_faults;
> > };
> >
> > /* pthread_mutex_t starts at page offset 0 */
> > @@ -141,9 +145,29 @@ static void uffd_stats_reset(struct uffd_stats *uffd_stats,
> > for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++) {
> > uffd_stats[i].cpu = i;
> > uffd_stats[i].missing_faults = 0;
> > + uffd_stats[i].wp_faults = 0;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void uffd_stats_report(struct uffd_stats *stats, int n_cpus)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + unsigned long long miss_total = 0, wp_total = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++) {
> > + miss_total += stats[i].missing_faults;
> > + wp_total += stats[i].wp_faults;
> > + }
> > +
> > + printf("userfaults: %llu missing (", miss_total);
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++)
> > + printf("%lu+", stats[i].missing_faults);
> > + printf("\b), %llu wp (", wp_total);
> > + for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++)
> > + printf("%lu+", stats[i].wp_faults);
> > + printf("\b)\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > static int anon_release_pages(char *rel_area)
> > {
> > int ret = 0;
> > @@ -264,19 +288,15 @@ struct uffd_test_ops {
> > void (*alias_mapping)(__u64 *start, size_t len, unsigned long offset);
> > };
> >
> > -#define ANON_EXPECTED_IOCTLS ((1 << _UFFDIO_WAKE) | \
> > - (1 << _UFFDIO_COPY) | \
> > - (1 << _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE))
> > -
> > static struct uffd_test_ops anon_uffd_test_ops = {
> > - .expected_ioctls = ANON_EXPECTED_IOCTLS,
> > + .expected_ioctls = UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS,
> > .allocate_area = anon_allocate_area,
> > .release_pages = anon_release_pages,
> > .alias_mapping = noop_alias_mapping,
> > };
> >
> > static struct uffd_test_ops shmem_uffd_test_ops = {
> > - .expected_ioctls = ANON_EXPECTED_IOCTLS,
> > + .expected_ioctls = UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS,
>
> Isn't UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS includes UFFDIO_WP which is not supported for
> shmem?
Yes it didn't fail the test case probably because the test case only
registers the shmem region with UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING, and for
now we'll simply blindly return the _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT capability if
the register ioctl succeeded. However it'll still fail the
UFFDIO_REGISTER ioctl directly if someone requests with
UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP mode upon shmem.
So maybe I should explicitly remove the _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT bit in
userfaultfd_register() if I detected any non-anonymous regions? Then
here I will revert to ANON_EXPECTED_IOCTLS for shmem_uffd_test_ops in
the tests.
>
> > .allocate_area = shmem_allocate_area,
> > .release_pages = shmem_release_pages,
> > .alias_mapping = noop_alias_mapping,
>
> ...
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
>
Regards,
--
Peter Xu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-26 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 113+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-12 2:56 [PATCH v2 00/26] userfaultfd: write protection support Peter Xu
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/26] mm: gup: rename "nonblocking" to "locked" where proper Peter Xu
2019-02-21 15:17 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-22 3:42 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/26] mm: userfault: return VM_FAULT_RETRY on signals Peter Xu
2019-02-21 15:29 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-22 3:51 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/26] userfaultfd: don't retake mmap_sem to emulate NOPAGE Peter Xu
2019-02-21 15:34 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/26] mm: allow VM_FAULT_RETRY for multiple times Peter Xu
2019-02-13 3:34 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-20 11:48 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-21 8:56 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Peter Xu
2019-02-21 15:53 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-22 4:25 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-22 15:11 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 6:19 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/26] mm: gup: " Peter Xu
2019-02-21 16:06 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-22 4:41 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-22 15:13 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/26] userfaultfd: wp: add helper for writeprotect check Peter Xu
2019-02-21 16:07 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 15:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/26] userfaultfd: wp: hook userfault handler to write protection fault Peter Xu
2019-02-21 16:25 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 15:43 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/26] userfaultfd: wp: add WP pagetable tracking to x86 Peter Xu
2019-02-21 17:20 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 15:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/26] userfaultfd: wp: userfaultfd_pte/huge_pmd_wp() helpers Peter Xu
2019-02-21 17:21 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 17:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/26] userfaultfd: wp: add UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2019-02-21 17:29 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-22 7:11 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-22 15:15 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 6:45 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-25 15:58 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 5:09 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-26 8:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/26] mm: merge parameters for change_protection() Peter Xu
2019-02-21 17:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 12/26] userfaultfd: wp: apply _PAGE_UFFD_WP bit Peter Xu
2019-02-21 17:44 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-22 7:31 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-22 15:17 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 18:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 13/26] mm: export wp_page_copy() Peter Xu
2019-02-21 17:44 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 14/26] userfaultfd: wp: handle COW properly for uffd-wp Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:04 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-22 8:46 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-22 15:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 7:13 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-25 15:32 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 15/26] userfaultfd: wp: drop _PAGE_UFFD_WP properly when fork Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:06 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-22 9:09 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-22 15:36 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 18:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 16/26] userfaultfd: wp: add pmd_swp_*uffd_wp() helpers Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:07 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 18:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 17/26] userfaultfd: wp: support swap and page migration Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:16 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 7:48 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-25 18:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 18/26] khugepaged: skip collapse if uffd-wp detected Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:17 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 18:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 19/26] userfaultfd: introduce helper vma_find_uffd Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:19 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 20:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 20/26] userfaultfd: wp: support write protection for userfault vma range Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:23 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 8:16 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-25 20:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 6:06 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-26 6:43 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 7:20 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-26 7:46 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 7:54 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 21/26] userfaultfd: wp: add the writeprotect API to userfaultfd ioctl Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:28 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 8:31 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-25 21:03 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 6:30 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 22/26] userfaultfd: wp: enabled write protection in userfaultfd API Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:29 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 8:34 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 23/26] userfaultfd: wp: don't wake up when doing write protect Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:36 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 8:58 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-25 21:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-25 21:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 6:24 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-26 7:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 7:41 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-26 8:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-28 2:47 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-26 8:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 24/26] userfaultfd: wp: UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP documentation update Peter Xu
2019-02-21 18:38 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-02-25 21:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 6:53 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-26 7:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 7:42 ` Peter Xu
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 25/26] userfaultfd: selftests: refactor statistics Peter Xu
2019-02-26 6:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-12 2:56 ` [PATCH v2 26/26] userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Peter Xu
2019-02-26 6:58 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-26 7:52 ` Peter Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190226075234.GN13653@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=cracauer@cons.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=gokhale2@llnl.gov \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcfadden8@llnl.gov \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).