linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] gdbstub: mark expected switch fall-throughs
@ 2019-02-26 19:16 Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2019-02-26 20:47 ` Jason Wessel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2019-02-26 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Wessel, Daniel Thompson
  Cc: kgdb-bugreport, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva, Kees Cook

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

kernel/debug/gdbstub.c: In function ‘gdb_serial_stub’:
kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1031:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    if (remcom_in_buffer[1] == '\0') {
       ^
kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1036:3: note: here
   case 'C': /* Exception passing */
   ^~~~
kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1040:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    if (tmp == 0)
       ^
kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1043:3: note: here
   case 'c': /* Continue packet */
   ^~~~
kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1050:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1052:3: note: here
   default:
   ^~~~~~~

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
 kernel/debug/gdbstub.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
index 7510dc687c0d..9f267b8905b4 100644
--- a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
+++ b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
@@ -1033,13 +1033,14 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
 				return DBG_PASS_EVENT;
 			}
 #endif
+			/* Fall through */
 		case 'C': /* Exception passing */
 			tmp = gdb_cmd_exception_pass(ks);
 			if (tmp > 0)
 				goto default_handle;
 			if (tmp == 0)
 				break;
-			/* Fall through on tmp < 0 */
+			/* Fall through - on tmp < 0 */
 		case 'c': /* Continue packet */
 		case 's': /* Single step packet */
 			if (kgdb_contthread && kgdb_contthread != current) {
@@ -1048,7 +1049,7 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
 				break;
 			}
 			dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
-			/* Fall through to default processing */
+			/* Fall through - to default processing */
 		default:
 default_handle:
 			error = kgdb_arch_handle_exception(ks->ex_vector,
-- 
2.21.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdbstub: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  2019-02-26 19:16 [PATCH] gdbstub: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2019-02-26 20:47 ` Jason Wessel
  2019-02-26 20:59   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2019-04-01 19:57   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wessel @ 2019-02-26 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva, Daniel Thompson
  Cc: kgdb-bugreport, linux-kernel, Kees Cook

We'll have to fix them at some point.

Acked-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>


Cheers,
Jason.

On 2/26/19 1:16 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
> 
> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c: In function ‘gdb_serial_stub’:
> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1031:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>      if (remcom_in_buffer[1] == '\0') {
>         ^
> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1036:3: note: here
>     case 'C': /* Exception passing */
>     ^~~~
> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1040:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>      if (tmp == 0)
>         ^
> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1043:3: note: here
>     case 'c': /* Continue packet */
>     ^~~~
> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1050:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>      dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1052:3: note: here
>     default:
>     ^~~~~~~
> 
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> 
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
> 
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---
>   kernel/debug/gdbstub.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> index 7510dc687c0d..9f267b8905b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> +++ b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> @@ -1033,13 +1033,14 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
>   				return DBG_PASS_EVENT;
>   			}
>   #endif
> +			/* Fall through */
>   		case 'C': /* Exception passing */
>   			tmp = gdb_cmd_exception_pass(ks);
>   			if (tmp > 0)
>   				goto default_handle;
>   			if (tmp == 0)
>   				break;
> -			/* Fall through on tmp < 0 */
> +			/* Fall through - on tmp < 0 */
>   		case 'c': /* Continue packet */
>   		case 's': /* Single step packet */
>   			if (kgdb_contthread && kgdb_contthread != current) {
> @@ -1048,7 +1049,7 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
>   				break;
>   			}
>   			dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
> -			/* Fall through to default processing */
> +			/* Fall through - to default processing */
>   		default:
>   default_handle:
>   			error = kgdb_arch_handle_exception(ks->ex_vector,
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdbstub: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  2019-02-26 20:47 ` Jason Wessel
@ 2019-02-26 20:59   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2019-04-01 19:57   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2019-02-26 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Wessel, Daniel Thompson; +Cc: kgdb-bugreport, linux-kernel, Kees Cook



On 2/26/19 2:47 PM, Jason Wessel wrote:
> We'll have to fix them at some point.
> 

Yep. And we're about to fix them all.

> Acked-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
> 

Thanks, Jason.

--
Gustavo

> 
> Cheers,
> Jason.
> 
> On 2/26/19 1:16 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>>
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c: In function ‘gdb_serial_stub’:
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1031:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>      if (remcom_in_buffer[1] == '\0') {
>>         ^
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1036:3: note: here
>>     case 'C': /* Exception passing */
>>     ^~~~
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1040:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>      if (tmp == 0)
>>         ^
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1043:3: note: here
>>     case 'c': /* Continue packet */
>>     ^~~~
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1050:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>      dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
>>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1052:3: note: here
>>     default:
>>     ^~~~~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
>> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/debug/gdbstub.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
>> index 7510dc687c0d..9f267b8905b4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
>> +++ b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
>> @@ -1033,13 +1033,14 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
>>                   return DBG_PASS_EVENT;
>>               }
>>   #endif
>> +            /* Fall through */
>>           case 'C': /* Exception passing */
>>               tmp = gdb_cmd_exception_pass(ks);
>>               if (tmp > 0)
>>                   goto default_handle;
>>               if (tmp == 0)
>>                   break;
>> -            /* Fall through on tmp < 0 */
>> +            /* Fall through - on tmp < 0 */
>>           case 'c': /* Continue packet */
>>           case 's': /* Single step packet */
>>               if (kgdb_contthread && kgdb_contthread != current) {
>> @@ -1048,7 +1049,7 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
>>                   break;
>>               }
>>               dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
>> -            /* Fall through to default processing */
>> +            /* Fall through - to default processing */
>>           default:
>>   default_handle:
>>               error = kgdb_arch_handle_exception(ks->ex_vector,
>>
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdbstub: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  2019-02-26 20:47 ` Jason Wessel
  2019-02-26 20:59   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2019-04-01 19:57   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2019-04-04 10:12     ` Daniel Thompson
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2019-04-01 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Wessel, Daniel Thompson; +Cc: kgdb-bugreport, linux-kernel, Kees Cook



On 2/26/19 2:47 PM, Jason Wessel wrote:
> We'll have to fix them at some point.
> 
> Acked-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
> 

Thank you, Jason.

Friendly ping:

Who can take this?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

> 
> Cheers,
> Jason.
> 
> On 2/26/19 1:16 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>>
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c: In function ‘gdb_serial_stub’:
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1031:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>      if (remcom_in_buffer[1] == '\0') {
>>         ^
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1036:3: note: here
>>     case 'C': /* Exception passing */
>>     ^~~~
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1040:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>      if (tmp == 0)
>>         ^
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1043:3: note: here
>>     case 'c': /* Continue packet */
>>     ^~~~
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1050:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>      dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
>>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1052:3: note: here
>>     default:
>>     ^~~~~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
>> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/debug/gdbstub.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
>> index 7510dc687c0d..9f267b8905b4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
>> +++ b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
>> @@ -1033,13 +1033,14 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
>>                   return DBG_PASS_EVENT;
>>               }
>>   #endif
>> +            /* Fall through */
>>           case 'C': /* Exception passing */
>>               tmp = gdb_cmd_exception_pass(ks);
>>               if (tmp > 0)
>>                   goto default_handle;
>>               if (tmp == 0)
>>                   break;
>> -            /* Fall through on tmp < 0 */
>> +            /* Fall through - on tmp < 0 */
>>           case 'c': /* Continue packet */
>>           case 's': /* Single step packet */
>>               if (kgdb_contthread && kgdb_contthread != current) {
>> @@ -1048,7 +1049,7 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
>>                   break;
>>               }
>>               dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
>> -            /* Fall through to default processing */
>> +            /* Fall through - to default processing */
>>           default:
>>   default_handle:
>>               error = kgdb_arch_handle_exception(ks->ex_vector,
>>
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdbstub: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  2019-04-01 19:57   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2019-04-04 10:12     ` Daniel Thompson
  2019-04-04 16:02       ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Thompson @ 2019-04-04 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva; +Cc: Jason Wessel, kgdb-bugreport, linux-kernel, Kees Cook

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 02:57:36PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/26/19 2:47 PM, Jason Wessel wrote:
> > We'll have to fix them at some point.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
> > 
> 
> Thank you, Jason.
> 
> Friendly ping:
> 
> Who can take this?

I happy to put it in my tree (probably next week).


Daniel.

> 
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
> 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Jason.
> > 
> > On 2/26/19 1:16 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> >> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> >>
> >> This patch fixes the following warnings:
> >>
> >> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c: In function ‘gdb_serial_stub’:
> >> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1031:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> >>      if (remcom_in_buffer[1] == '\0') {
> >>         ^
> >> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1036:3: note: here
> >>     case 'C': /* Exception passing */
> >>     ^~~~
> >> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1040:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> >>      if (tmp == 0)
> >>         ^
> >> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1043:3: note: here
> >>     case 'c': /* Continue packet */
> >>     ^~~~
> >> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1050:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> >>      dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
> >>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c:1052:3: note: here
> >>     default:
> >>     ^~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> >>
> >> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> >> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
> >>
> >> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> >> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> >> ---
> >>   kernel/debug/gdbstub.c | 5 +++--
> >>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> >> index 7510dc687c0d..9f267b8905b4 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> >> @@ -1033,13 +1033,14 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
> >>                   return DBG_PASS_EVENT;
> >>               }
> >>   #endif
> >> +            /* Fall through */
> >>           case 'C': /* Exception passing */
> >>               tmp = gdb_cmd_exception_pass(ks);
> >>               if (tmp > 0)
> >>                   goto default_handle;
> >>               if (tmp == 0)
> >>                   break;
> >> -            /* Fall through on tmp < 0 */
> >> +            /* Fall through - on tmp < 0 */
> >>           case 'c': /* Continue packet */
> >>           case 's': /* Single step packet */
> >>               if (kgdb_contthread && kgdb_contthread != current) {
> >> @@ -1048,7 +1049,7 @@ int gdb_serial_stub(struct kgdb_state *ks)
> >>                   break;
> >>               }
> >>               dbg_activate_sw_breakpoints();
> >> -            /* Fall through to default processing */
> >> +            /* Fall through - to default processing */
> >>           default:
> >>   default_handle:
> >>               error = kgdb_arch_handle_exception(ks->ex_vector,
> >>
> > 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdbstub: mark expected switch fall-throughs
  2019-04-04 10:12     ` Daniel Thompson
@ 2019-04-04 16:02       ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2019-04-04 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Thompson; +Cc: Jason Wessel, kgdb-bugreport, linux-kernel, Kees Cook



On 4/4/19 5:12 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 02:57:36PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/26/19 2:47 PM, Jason Wessel wrote:
>>> We'll have to fix them at some point.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
>>>
>>
>> Thank you, Jason.
>>
>> Friendly ping:
>>
>> Who can take this?
> 
> I happy to put it in my tree (probably next week).
> 

Awesome. :)

Thanks, Daniel.
--
Gustavo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-04 16:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-26 19:16 [PATCH] gdbstub: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-02-26 20:47 ` Jason Wessel
2019-02-26 20:59   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-04-01 19:57   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-04-04 10:12     ` Daniel Thompson
2019-04-04 16:02       ` Gustavo A. R. Silva

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).