From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9010BC43381 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6291321850 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731030AbfB1K7j (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:59:39 -0500 Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.90]:36808 "EHLO albert.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727086AbfB1K7i (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:59:38 -0500 Received: from ramsan ([84.194.111.163]) by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id iAzc1z00c3XaVaC06AzcK8; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:59:36 +0100 Received: from rox.of.borg ([192.168.97.57]) by ramsan with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gzJPc-0007Ru-Ci; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:59:36 +0100 Received: from geert by rox.of.borg with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gzJPc-0000Lc-AQ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:59:36 +0100 From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Jonathan Corbet , "Paul E . McKenney" Cc: Josh Triplett , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Joel Fernandes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: [PATCH] doc: rcu: Suspicious RCU usage is a warning Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:59:32 +0100 Message-Id: <20190228105932.1274-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Suspicious RCU usage messages are reported as warnings. Fixes: a5dd63efda3d07b5 ("lockdep: Use "WARNING" tag on lockdep splats") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven --- And before that, they were printed as errors, which was also never reflected in the documentation... --- Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt index 9423b633526d14df..9c015976b174123f 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ being the real world and all that. So let's look at an example RCU lockdep splat from 3.0-rc5, one that has long since been fixed: -=============================== -[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] -------------------------------- +============================= +WARNING: suspicious RCU usage +----------------------------- block/cfq-iosched.c:2776 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! other info that might help us debug this: -- 2.17.1