From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABE8C43381 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 05:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F071720815 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 05:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726098AbfCDFbj (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2019 00:31:39 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:33849 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726041AbfCDFbj (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2019 00:31:39 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Mar 2019 21:31:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,438,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="131357404" Received: from local-michael-cet-test.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.128]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2019 21:31:36 -0800 Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:26:08 +0800 From: Yang Weijiang To: Sean Christopherson Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, yu-cheng.yu@intel.com, Zhang Yi Z Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM:VMX: Load Guest CET via VMCS when CET is enabled in Guest Message-ID: <20190303122608.GA32013@local-michael-cet-test.sh.intel.com> References: <20190225132716.6982-1-weijiang.yang@intel.com> <20190225132716.6982-7-weijiang.yang@intel.com> <20190228161715.GF6166@linux.intel.com> <20190228083844.GC12006@local-michael-cet-test.sh.intel.com> <20190301145819.GC22584@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190301145819.GC22584@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:58:19AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 04:38:44PM +0800, Yang Weijiang wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 08:17:15AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 09:27:14PM +0800, Yang Weijiang wrote: > > > > "Load Guest CET state" bit controls whether guest CET states > > > > will be loaded at Guest entry. Before doing that, KVM needs > > > > to check if CPU CET feature is available. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Z > > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang > > > > --- > > > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > > > > index 89ee086e1729..d32cee9ee079 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > > > > @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ > > > > #include > > > > #include > > > > #include > > > > +#include > > > > > > > > #include "trace.h" > > > > #include "pmu.h" > > > > @@ -4065,6 +4066,20 @@ static inline bool vmx_feature_control_msr_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > > > return !(val & ~valid_bits); > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static int vmx_guest_cet_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > > > +{ > > > > + u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx; > > > > + > > > > + /* > > > > + * Guest CET can work as long as HW supports the feature, independent > > > > + * to Host SW enabling status. > > > > + */ > > > > + cpuid_count(7, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); > > > > + > > > > + return ((ecx & bit(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) | > > > > + (edx & bit(X86_FEATURE_IBT))) ? 1 : 0; > > > > > > Given the holes in the (current) architecture/spec, I think KVM has to > > > require both features to be supported in the guest to allow CR4.CET to > > > be enabled. > > The reason why I use a "OR" here is to keep CET enabling control the > > same as that on host, right now on host, users can select to enable SHSTK or IBT > > feature by disabling the unexpected one. It's free to select SHSTK & IBT > > or SHSTK | IBT. > > Which is not the same as SHSTK != IBT in *hardware*, which is effectively > what this is allowing for the guest. The problem is that the architecture > doesn't cleanly separate the two features, i.e. we'd have a virtualization > hole where the guest could touch state for a disabled feature. > > Regardless, the guest would still be able to selectively enable each CET > feature, it would just never see a model where SHSTK != IBT. Hi, Sean, I'd like to understand your concerns. From my point of view, e.g., when only IBT is enabled, PL3_SSP MSR would be unnecessrily exposed, this is the design "limitation", but PL3_SSP keeps 0 if SHSTK is not configured. Could you detail your concerns?