From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B652AC43381 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 01:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E30920842 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 01:49:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551664182; bh=zRo6OZVs2iaEmQkB/4mwvw7u1FMqfZRQgoiE5VVlvv0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Oj7RXyVdEcFsloGL1AThmLoN+v/gD0Oa/FHqW/rMQnqMQPmW2OfQ/00w8wWRZ+vXK IauJ7ThQPkQToByNKI87AHJ8UMBNUxMzlmRZbUQ5bgeq5IlQrZDbJll6uYcBmfAeQB Etjlis1uGjACJC8gWPno0n8l5iDuRA7CCA8UVN9s= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726234AbfCDBtl (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:49:41 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50620 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726012AbfCDBtk (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:49:40 -0500 Received: from dragon (61-216-91-114.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.216.91.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C608A20835; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 01:49:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551664180; bh=zRo6OZVs2iaEmQkB/4mwvw7u1FMqfZRQgoiE5VVlvv0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=i+gSSXFi5R5Q9EXHyD3ScWTcQHUtohbA5fxjKcGiLX3X7p0yXcbapXdpvw+6XYL+/ 50hXHKvxQyxocn7cbfwJ3BxloIivkymaNSgbPBthdNUIPIwotleHRr3oiRrMfocbkx OjhlWsoruKg6FC7PbN+dP305Ssegg8pWmI054EiE= Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:48:40 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Alison Wang Cc: leoyang.li@nxp.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: add pmu dt nodes Message-ID: <20190304014838.GV26041@dragon> References: <20190227015752.18342-1-alison.wang@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190227015752.18342-1-alison.wang@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:57:52AM +0800, Alison Wang wrote: > This patch adds pmu dt nodes for LS1028A. > > Signed-off-by: Alison Wang > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 5 +++++ > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > index a8cf92a..36ef9c5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; > }; > > + pmu { > + compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3"; Shouldn't we use "arm,cortex-a72-pmu" as compatible for better? Shawn > + interrupts = ; > + }; > + > gic: interrupt-controller@6000000 { > compatible= "arm,gic-v3"; > #address-cells = <2>; > -- > 1.7.1 >